Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Scott, 307 So. 2d 291.

14 citing documents.

State v. Henry 124 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(prohibiting questioning aimed at determining potential racial bias was proper because the question was irrelevant, inflammatory, and misleading).
State v. Sullivan 596 So. 2d 177 La. 1992
Ryland v. LAW FIRM OF TAYLOR, PORTER, BROOKS & PHILLIPS 496 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
1621 , 56 L.Ed.2d 67 (1978); United States v. Hall, supra; ” From the facts of this case, we make the determination that there was more than reasonable suspicion to stop the Nieto vehicle when the officers did.
State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
State v. Morrison 392 So. 2d 1037 La. 1980
State v. Dupart 383 So. 2d 1226 La. 1980
1621 , 56 L.Ed.2d 67 (1978); United States v. Hall, supra
State v. Alexander 351 So. 2d 505 La. 1977
In State v. Scott, La., (1975), we stated: "A ruling by the trial court in connection with counsel's conduct of voir dire examination should not be disturbed by a reviewing court as long as the trial court has allowed counsel a wide latitude in examining jurors and has exercised a liberal discretion in delimiting the scope of the inquiry.
State v. Roach 338 So. 2d 621 La. 1976
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
State ex rel. Bazile v. Henderson 323 So. 2d 140 La. 1975
See State v. Scott & Bazile
State v. Jones 320 So. 2d 182 La. 1975
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing the hypothetical question as irrelevant and potentially misleading insofar as the issue of racial bias, especially since the ruling expressly did not preclude relevant and rational examination of the venireman of the issue.
State v. Truss 317 So. 2d 177 La. 1975
State v. Jones 308 So. 2d 790 La. 1975
decided January 20, 1975.