DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Heck, 307 So. 2d 332.

15 citing documents.

  • State in the Interest of D. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    the supreme court stated, “The phrase „engaging in a fistic encounter‟ also appears to be reasonably clear.
  • State ex rel. D.J. 149 So. 3d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    the supreme court stated, “The phrase ‘engaging in a fistic encounter’ also appears to be reasonably clear.
  • State v. Trepagnier 982 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    [4] (1975), the Louisiana Supreme Court approved the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the phrase "(as would) foreseeably disturb or alarm the public" in Garner v. State of Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157 , 82 S.Ct.
  • State v. Champagne 520 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    The phrase "foreseeably disturb or alarm the public" has been jurisprudentially defined: (1975), this Court approved the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the phrase "[as would] foreseeably disturb or alarm the public" in Garner v. State of Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157 , 82 S.Ct.
  • State v. Encalade 505 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    State v. Gisclair, supra
  • State v. Hudnall 480 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Robertson 464 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bissett 451 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jordan 369 So. 2d 1347 La. 1979
    (1975), this Court approved the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the phrase "[as would] foreseeably disturb or alarm the public" in Garner v. State of Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157 , 82 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gisclair 363 So. 2d 696 La. 1978
  • Connick v. Lucky Pierre's 331 So. 2d 431 La. 1976
    989 (1953); State v. Heck, La., (1975); City of Baton Rouge v. Norman, La., (1974).
  • State v. Newton 328 So. 2d 110 La. 1976
    14:3; State v. Heck, La., (1975); State v. Truby, 211 La.
  • State v. Comeaux 319 So. 2d 897 La. 1975
    Recently, in State v. Heck, La., (1975), we reviewed the principles for testing the constitutionality of a statute attacked for vagueness.
  • State v. Carpenter 319 So. 2d 355 La. 1975
    See, e. g., (statute proscribing disturbing the peace by “engaging in a fistic encounter” upheld); State v. Dardar, 257 La.
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ewing 308 So. 2d 776 La. 1975
    (decided January 20, 1975,) ("engaging in a fistic encounter"); (La.