DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Foss, 310 So. 2d 573.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Asa Bentley AKA - Asa N. Bentley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra.
  • State v. Bentley 182 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra.
  • State v. Williams 878 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra .
  • State v. Maze 596 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Brown 557 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Mullins 537 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra [ ].
  • State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Odds 430 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Taylor 430 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    in support of the argument for reversal under this assignment.
  • State v. McMahon 391 So. 2d 1120 La. 1980
  • State v. Johnson 388 So. 2d 741 La. 1980
  • State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
  • State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
  • State v. Donahue 355 So. 2d 247 La. 1978
  • State v. Gaines 347 So. 2d 1153 La. 1977
  • State v. Hegwood 345 So. 2d 1179 La. 1977
  • State v. Lee 346 So. 2d 682 La. 1977
    In certain instances, however, objections which come shortly thereafter will be considered timely, and there are even instances in which no objections are required because they would be a vain and useless act, see State v. Ervin, supra .
  • State v. Morris 340 So. 2d 195 La. 1976
    [4] According to the discussion outside the presence of the jury, which was held to be reversible error.
  • State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
    The statement made here was not of the gratuitous, unresponsive nature which we found to require a
  • State v. Redwine 337 So. 2d 1041 La. 1976
  • Distinguished State v. Overton 337 So. 2d 1058 La. 1976
    a *1064 police officer gave an unresponsive answer to a question propounded by defense counsel which was held to warrant reversal.
  • State v. Lepkowski 316 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
  • State v. Smith 310 So. 2d 580 La. 1975
    See: (rendered this date); and decisions therein cited.