DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Association v. Edwins, 329 So. 2d 437.

98 citing documents.

  • Mona Leblanc v. Walmart Distribution Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins
  • State of Louisiana Versus Kenneth C. Lods La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • Burnett v. Full Force Staffing, LLC 257 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • In Re: L.M.M., Jr., a Minor La. 2018
    13 “Clear and convincing” evidence requires more than a “preponderance,” but less than “beyond a reasonable doubt.” See 22 in circumstances of L.M.M.
  • Tammy Renea Martin Harruff v. Richard B. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    The clear and convincing standard “requires that the existence of the disputed fact be highly probable, that is, much more probable than its nonexistence.” Louisiana State Bar Ass’ (quoting Sanders, The Anatomy of Proof in Civil Actions, 28 La.L.Rev.
  • Harruff v. King 139 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The clear and convincing standard “requires that the existence of the disputed fact be highly probable, that is, much more probable than its nonexistence.” Louisiana State Bar Ass’ (quoting Sanders, The Anatomy of Proof in Civil Actions, 28 La.L.Rev.
  • Mulkey v. Mulkey 118 So. 3d 357 La. 2013
    “Clear and convincing” means more than a “preponderance” but less than “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • State ex rel. A.V.P. 108 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In re Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), .
  • Blanchard v. Blanchard 112 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Based on the wording of the confirmation letter between Saunders and Hamilton, the agreement was that Kathi’s one-third of the settlement proceeds would be calculated from Henry’s net recovery, after factoring in attorney’s fees and “litigation expenses.” The jurisprudence of this state, beginning with the case of Louisiana State Bar Ass’ has permitted attorneys to advance funds to their clients for minimal, necessary living expenses.
  • Hall v. Macpapers, Inc. 95 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 7/13/05), , citing Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins
  • In re L.P. 64 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Carolyn Sanchez v. Louisiana Nursery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Sanchez v. Louisiana Nursery 34 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • In Re Fenasci 21 So. 3d 934 La. 2009
    Respondent argued that the controlling rule of law at the time of his alleged misconduct was that set forth in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins, (La.
  • Decquir v. Acorn 18 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 7/13/05), , citing Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins
  • La. State Bar Ass'n v. CARR AND ASSOCIATES 15 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5(A) & (B); Rules of Supreme Comb of Louisiana, Rule 19, Section 1; 8-441 (La.1976).
  • Hanks v. Entergy Corp. 944 So. 2d 564 La. 2006
  • In Re Succession of Crawford 923 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • Molinere v. Vinson Guard Service, Inc. 914 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Lawanda Theodile v. Rpm Pizza, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    v. Edwins, wherein it was explained that: “Nor do we see how a lawyer’s guarantee of necessary medical treatment for his client .
  • Theodile v. RPM Pizza, Inc. 865 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    v. Edwins, wherein it was explained that: "Nor do we see how a lawyer's guarantee of necessary medical treatment for his client ...
  • Simmons v. Chambliss 852 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 788 So. 2d 1140 La. 2001
    The majority today decides that because advancing funds to a a lawyer can also reasonably require the payment of interest on such advances at the legal rate where no agreement on a specific interest rate is made.
  • State Ex Rel. IDH v. Thomas 787 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • In re Maxwell 783 So. 2d 1244 La. 2001
    However, the jurisprudence of this court, as exemplified by Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins, has permitted attorneys to advance funds to their clients for minimal, necessary living expenses.
  • Chittenden v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 748 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    It is obvious that the "ghost writer(s)" of the advisory opinion for whatever reasons they may have had, chose to ignore the fine "dissertation" by the late learned Justice Tate in his decision in Louisiana State Bar Assn v. Edwins, 55456
  • Cash v. McGregor 730 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Co., Mitchell v. AT & T, 27,290 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/28/95), , writ de *500 nied 95-2474 (La.12/15/95), ; Renter v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 28,589 (La.App.
  • State, in Interest of Bkf 704 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • McGaughey v. City of New Orleans 695 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Ragas v. Ragas 690 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    -445 (La.1976), the court held that the attorney's payment of three car notes and costs for tires, on behalf of his client, qualified as living expenses and as such were proper advances.
  • In Re Caulfield 683 So. 2d 714 La. 1996
  • Wilson v. Grosjean Contractors, Inc. 682 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Green v. Conagra Broiler Co., 26,599 (La.App.2d Cir. 3/1/95), .
  • Fritz v. Home Furniture-Lafayette 677 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Chatelain v. State, DOTD, Bundren v. Affiliated Nursing Homes, Inc., 94-808 (La.App.
  • Knotts v. Snelling Temporaries 665 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Green v. ConAgra Broiler Co., supra .
  • Williams v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. 662 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Mitchell v. AT & T 660 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Green v. Con Agra Broiler Co., 26,599 (La.
  • State, in Interest of Ga 664 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Bass v. Farmer & Cheatham 658 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • In Re Huckaby 656 So. 2d 292 La. 1995
  • Perfect Equipment Corp. v. Louisiana Recycling, Inc. 655 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    2d Cir.1990); Louisiana State Bar Assoc, v. Ed/wins
  • Green v. Conagra Broiler Co. 651 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • In Interest of CLS 649 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Succession of Dowling 633 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Hopes v. Domtar Industries 627 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Bryant v. Giani Inv. Co. 626 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State ex rel. Manuel v. Manuel 619 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Succession of Cole 618 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • Dupuis v. Faulk 609 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    at page 446, the Supreme Court addressed the propriety of advancing financial assistance during representation of a client: If an impoverished person is unable to secure subsistence from some source during disability, he may be deprived of the only effective means by which he can wait out the necessary dela
  • Succeesion of Dorand 596 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State in Interest of KD 586 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991