Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bell, 315 So. 2d 307.

103 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Scott Allen Cooper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Defendant contended that this is one of those exceptional circumstances where prejudice should be presumed.
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Stacey Glenn Wilhite La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
1986); State v. Bell , (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Charles McQuarter, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Ernesto Alonso-Llerena La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Frank Garcia La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. Hust 214 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Clark , 2002-1463, p. 16, 851 So.2d at 1070 ().
State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
the Louisiana Supreme Court enumerated several factors to be considered in the change of venue determination.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1794 , 182 L.Ed.2d 621 (2012); State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 32 (La.1/16/08)
State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
1794 , 182 L.Ed.2d 621 (2012); State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 32 (La.1/16/08)
State v. Brown 86 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
we enumerated some relevant factors in determining whether to change venue.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Frank, 99-0553 at pp. 11-12, 803 So.2d at 12-13 ().
State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Frank , 99-0553 at pp. 11-12, 803 So.2d at 12 -13 ().
State v. Logan 986 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
see also Manning, 03-1982 at pp. 7-8, 885 So.2d at 1061-62 .
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
Manning , *317 XXXX-XXXX p. 7-8, 885 So.2d at 1061-1062 ; Hoffman , XXXX-XXXX p. 6, 768 So.2d at 553
State v. Wright 931 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
the supreme court enumerated several factors to consider when determining whether to change venue.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Davis, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Davis 929 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
[4] Defendant claims the trial court's assessment of the jurors' familiarity with the *1061 case was mistaken because of its failure to conduct individualized voir dire and that in any event, demonstrates it erred in denying the motion.
State v. Dooley 882 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. George 855 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.06/27/03), ; State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.01/17/01), ; appeal after remand
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
Frank , 99-0553 at pp. 11-12, 803 So.2d at 12 -13 ().
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
(citing Groppi v. Wisconsin, 400 U.S. 505 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Morris 770 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 5 (La.4/11/2000), ; cert.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Hundley 760 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
Const. art. 1, § 16; (La.
State v. Timon 683 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Pittman 683 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Hattaway 674 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
For a discussion of factors to be considered in determining whether a change of venue is appropriate, (La.
State v. Huls 676 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
appeal after remand, Savage, .
State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Cf. State v. Brown, supra ; and State v. Griffin, supra .
State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
See and compare, State v. Brown, and State v. Henry, supra .
State v. Wright 593 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
the Supreme Court of Louisiana itemized at page 311 factors for the trial judge to consider in determining whether to change venue.
State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
appeal *484 after remand, (La.
State v. Henderson 566 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. McGraw 564 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
held: "Some relevant factors in determining whether to change venue are (1) The nature of pre-trial publicity and the particular degree to which it has circulated in the community, (2) The connection of government officials with the release of the publicity, (3) The length of time between the dissemination o