Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Elam, 312 So. 2d 318.

45 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. William B. Turner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lee 996 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 1/26/99) , ; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Scott Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Ragas 960 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Collier 909 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Lewis 892 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Ellis 672 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Scales 655 So. 2d 1326 La. 1995
However, -22 (La.1975), we cautioned against a direct reference by the prosecutor to an opinion by name.
State v. Singleton 589 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Savoy 551 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
This rule was applied to a
State v. Harrison 501 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Caillouet 496 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Woods 494 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Kellogg 452 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
. for the proposition that "hand in a pocket” is not a dangerous weapon.
State v. Smith 450 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
[1] and it will not support a conviction of armed robbery.
State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980); State v. Sykes, supra
State v. Talbert 416 So. 2d 97 La. 1982
State v. Talbot 408 So. 2d 861 La. 1981
State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
In a case factually similar to the instant case, the victim of a robbery was threatened with being shot if he failed to comply with the robber's demands.
State v. Brown 371 So. 2d 746 La. 1979
State v. Dickerson 368 So. 2d 703 La. 1979
Nor did the testimony objected to indicate that defendant was arrested for committing a theft outside of Schweg-mann’ “the Prieur notice requirement is, by the opinion itself [Pri-eur], confined to cases where the State intends to offer evidence of ‘other criminal offenses’.” In this case where defendant never conceded his involvement in the incident outside of the Circle Food Store (he did not testify), the state had
State v. Johnson 368 So. 2d 719 La. 1979
State v. Bonier 367 So. 2d 824 La. 1979
State v. Sykes 364 So. 2d 1293 La. 1978
State v. Thompson 364 So. 2d 908 La. 1978
State v. Leggett 363 So. 2d 434 La. 1978
State v. Scott 358 So. 2d 1271 La. 1978
Criticized State v. Pounds 359 So. 2d 150 La. 1978
The majority opinions of this Court which permit a prosecutor to cross-examine a defendant on the circumstances surrounding the crime forming the basis of a prior conviction, regardless of their irrelevance *154 to the witness' credibility, have been criticized, Pugh, The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1974-1975 Term-Evidence, 36 La.L.Rev.
State v. Dupar 353 So. 2d 272 La. 1977
State v. Whitmore 353 So. 2d 1286 La. 1977
See State v. Jackson, La., (1975); State v. Elam, La., (1975).
State v. Elzie 351 So. 2d 1174 La. 1977
State v. Ballard 351 So. 2d 484 La. 1977
State v. Victor 347 So. 2d 205 La. 1977
NOTES [1] Although a majority of this Court held that such details are admissible, departing from the previous jurisprudence of this Court, (La.
State v. McMorris 343 So. 2d 1011 La. 1977
although this court did find that there was "some evidence" that the defendant was armed with a dangerous weapon (although no weapon was in fact found), the court made the following observation: "This holding does not make any extension of Levi ( State v. Levi, 259 La.
State v. Chenier 343 So. 2d 177 La. 1977
State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
State v. Jackson 339 So. 2d 730 La. 1976
In State v. Elam, La., (1975), we extended the Jackson holding to apply to defendants testifying in their own behalf.
State v. Williams 339 So. 2d 728 La. 1976
this Court unanimously applied the rationale of the Jackson opinion to the cross-examination of a defendant who had taken the stand.
State v. McClinton 329 So. 2d 676 La. 1976
State v. Chaffin 324 So. 2d 369 La. 1975
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975