Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 319 So. 2d 766.

79 citing documents.

Angela Pickard v. amazon.com, Inc. La. 2024
6 As observed by former Justice Tate, “Indeed, much confusion has resulted in Louisiana from the use of the word ‘possession’ in the Civil Code and in the jurisprudence.” Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., (Tate, J., concurring).
Jessica Schaubhut Cortez Versus Mary A. Schaubhut La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Janice Dickerson v. Axiall Corporation, Axiall, LLC, and Plant Security, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Crooks v. Department Of Natural Resources 263 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Land & Exploration Co. , , 780 (La.1975), that "[p]ossession is interrupted when possession is lost."
Steve Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. State of La., Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Land & Exploration Co., that “[p]ossession is interrupted when possession is lost.” Louisiana Civil Code Article 3433 further explains that “[p]ossession is lost when the possessor manifests his intention to abandon it or when he is evicted by another by force or usurpation.” Here, the record indicates that the State’s po
Harley Mitchem v. Lester Soileau and Jeanelle Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Mitchem v. Soileau 222 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Marlon Littleton v. Saline Lakeshore, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“The quality of possession required in a particular case depends not only on its classification as good or bad faith possession, but also on the type of land in dispute.” Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., [] at 772 [La.1975].
Littleton v. Saline Lakeshore, LLC 178 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“The quality of possession required in a particular case depends not only on its classification as good or bad faith possession, but also on the type of land in dispute.” Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., [ ] at 772 [La.1975], The acts of possession required in the case of farm land must be of a greater quality than in the case of woodland; and, a greater quality of pos *278 session is required in the case of woodland than in the case of swamp or marsh land.
Strain v. Aaron 162 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company
EOG Resources, Inc. v. Hopkins 131 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Land & Exploration Co., Ryan v. Lee, 38,352 (La.App.2d Cir.4/14/04), , writ denied, 2004-1531 (La.10/1/04), .
Luffey Timber Co., LLC v. Florence 106 So. 3d 596 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., Ryan v. Lee, 38,352 (La.App.2d Cir.04/14/04), , writ denied, 04-1531 (La.10/01/04), .
Ricko Construction, Inc. v. Dubois 57 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., supra [ ] at 772 [La.1975].
Saunders v. Hollis 17 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Holley Homestead Trust v. Harrison 11 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., Ryan v. Lee, 38,352 (La.App.
Hollenshead v. Dominick 9 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 3655; Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.
Teresa Allen v. Glenn Edward Belgard, Et Ux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Allen v. Belgard 925 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bessie L. Otwell v. Diversified Timber Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
As the supreme court explained in Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., “[t]he concept of possession is neither simple nor precise.” Thus, “the corporeal possession requisite in the case of agricultural land should not be the same as that in the case of wood land or swamp land.
Otwell v. Diversified Timber Services, Inc. 896 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
As the supreme court explained in Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., "[t]he concept of possession is neither simple nor precise."
Ryan v. Lee 870 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., citing, Melvin H. Riseman, Elementary Considerations in the Commencement of Prescription on Immovable Property, 12 Tul.
Secret Cove, LLC v. Thomas 862 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Cuthbertson, 544 So.2d at 1239 .
Cockrell Investment Partners, L.P. v. Southwestern Energy Production Co. 809 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Griffin v. Lago Espanol, LLC 808 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.
Poirrier v. Dale's Dozer Service, Inc. 770 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Hawkins v. Ashuca Co. 649 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
and was subsequently adopted by the redactors in a 1982 amendment to La.Civ.Code Ann. art. 3422.
Soileau v. Matte 647 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, supra [ ].
Prieto v. St. Tammany Homesites, Inc. 602 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
O'BRIEN v. Alcus Lands Partnership Trust 577 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Chevron USA Inc. v. Landry 558 So. 2d 242 La. 1990
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Landry 546 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Cuthbertson v. Unopened Succession of Tate 544 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Boneno v. Lasseigne 534 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
equated the possession required to bring a possessory action with the possession required to commence the running of acquisitive prescription.
Miller v. Hilton 527 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Amis v. Miller 524 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
App.3rd Cir.1965); (La.App.
Richardson v. Hesser 516 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Riverlands Fleeting Corp. v. Milliken & Farwell, Inc. 515 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Possession is interrupted when it is lost,’ (J. Tate in his concurrence on the denial for rehearing).
Manzanares v. Meche 506 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
See Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, (La.
Boise Southern Co. v. Stanfield 509 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
River Lands Fleeting Corp. v. Ashland Plantation, Inc. 498 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Possession is interrupted when it is lost," (J. Tate in his concurrence on the denial for rehearing).
Armstrong v. Armstrong 493 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
art. 3660; Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, [ , La.
Alford v. Jarrell 471 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
O'Quinn v. Haas Investment Company, Inc., (La.App.
Todd v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 474 So. 2d 430 La. 1985
Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Mulkey v. Stoney-Point Missionary Baptist Church 462 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Todd v. State Through Dept. of Natural Res. 456 So. 2d 1340 La. 1984
: "For example, the word possession in Civil Code Articles 3426-3431, 3436-3438, means physical control over a thing that one has acquired with the intent to own it.
O'Quinn v. Haas Inv. Co., Inc. 458 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
: "The concept of possession is neither simple nor precise.
Evans v. Dunn 458 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Romar v. Estate of Gay 454 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Oliver v. Kennington 458 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by