Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bluain, 315 So. 2d 749.

43 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Terrence Armstrong A/K/A Terrance Armstrong A/K/A Dugga La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Lionel Caire La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Terry James Goodeaux -Aka- Terry Goodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3001, 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976), on remand, [.]
State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
State v. *29 Jones, (La.App.
State v. Aulph 114 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See, State v. Fitzgerald, 248 La.
State of Louisiana v. Kent Dale Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3001, 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976), on remand, [.]
State v. Simon 62 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3001 , 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976), on remand, ; [.]
State v. Crochet 931 So. 2d 1083 La. 2006
The amendment was one of substance which the state was empowered to make prior to the commencement of trial."); (1975) (amendment adding count to indictment); State v. Mills, 04-0489 (La.App.
State v. Delandro 818 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3001 , 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976), on remand
State v. Smith 815 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Wallace 788 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Gilbert 760 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[3] State v. Ignot, 29,745 (La.App.
State v. Ignot 701 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
3001 , 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976), on remand
State v. Johnson 637 So. 2d 1033 La. 1994
3001 , 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976), on remand, ; At a bench conference conducted just after the state's opening remarks to the jury, defense counsel protested that the defendant was "being tried for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, not bunk.
State v. Jones 587 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Neal 500 So. 2d 374 La. 1987
State v. Rodriguez 476 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
*510 (La.1975), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that, where amendments are designed to cure deficiencies and not to alter the nature of the crime, as in the instant case, defendant is not entitled to a re-arraignment.
State v. Leason 477 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Gaines 452 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 439 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Guin 444 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
State v. Ponthier 391 So. 2d 1138 La. 1980
1023 , 47 L.Ed.2d 222 (1976)
State v. Coleman 390 So. 2d 865 La. 1980
State v. Williams 383 So. 2d 996 La. 1980
State v. Davis 385 So. 2d 193 La. 1980
State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
State v. Phillips 365 So. 2d 1304 La. 1978
State v. Strother 362 So. 2d 508 La. 1978
State v. Lovett 359 So. 2d 163 La. 1978
State v. Fitzgerald, 248 La.
State v. Cramer 358 So. 2d 1277 La. 1978
State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
State v. Fitzgerald, 248 La.
State v. Boettcher 338 So. 2d 1356 La. 1976
State v. Badon 338 So. 2d 665 La. 1976
State v. Bluain, La., (1975); State v. Elie, 257 La.
State v. McCoy 337 So. 2d 192 La. 1976
In light of these decisions, that La.R.S.
State v. Brown 326 So. 2d 839 La. 1976
State v. Calloway 324 So. 2d 801 La. 1976
State v. Roberts 319 So. 2d 317 La. 1975
decided on June 23, 1975; State v. Royal, 255 La.