Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 320 So. 2d 163.

600 citing documents.

Dustin Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. 65 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Harbor Construction Co. v. Board of Supervisors 69 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 60 So. 3d 1220 La. 2011
Andre Guillory v. Allied Waste Industries, Inc. & Aig La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2164 states, in pertinent part, “[t]he appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal.” Our supreme court, -66 (La.1975) (citations and footnotes omitted) stated: While the trial court remains the original forum for resolving factual and legal issues, the Louisiana Constitution expressly extends the jurisdiction of appellate courts in civil cases to the review of facts as well as law.
Guillory v. ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. 47 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2164 states, in pertinent part, “[t]he appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal.” Our supreme court, , -66 (1975) (citations and footnotes omitted) stated: While the trial court remains the original forum for resolving factual and legal issues, the Louisiana Constitution expressly extends the jurisdiction of appellate courts in civil cases to the review of facts as well as law.
McGee v. Brand Services, Inc. 48 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Tyson v. King 29 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Prejean v. Guillory 28 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 2164 states, in pertinent part, “[t]he appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal.” Our supreme court, , -66 (La.1975) (citations and footnote omitted) stated: While the trial court remains the original forum for resolving factual and legal issues, the Louisiana Constitution expressly extends the jurisdiction of appellate courts in civil cases to the review of facts as well as law.
Kathy Prejean v. Walter Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 2164 states, in pertinent part, “[t]he appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal and proper upon the record on appeal.” Our supreme court, -66 (La.1975) (citations and footnote omitted) stated: While the trial court remains the original forum for resolving factual and legal issues, the Louisiana Constitution expressly extends the jurisdiction of appellate courts
Janell Ernst v. Dr. Flynn A. Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/22/96), (); Galloway v. Baton Rouge Gen.
Ernst v. Taylor 17 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 95-801 (La.3/22/96), ( , (1975)); Galloway v. Baton Rouge Gen.
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 10 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Re Raspanti 8 So. 3d 526 La. 2009
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434, p. 3 (La.10/15/96), , , (1969), overruled on other grounds, Gonzales v. Xerox Corporation, 254 La.
Rathborne v. Rathborne 999 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LeRouge 995 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
2; Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 55968 (La.10/1/75), , .
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Monteleone 976 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS. 972 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Susan Arrington, Etc. v. Er Physicians Group, Apmc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
“When the entire record is before the appellate court, remand for a new trial produces delay of the final outcome and congestion of crowded dockets while adding little to the judicial determination process.”
Charles Ray Taylor, Jr. v. Richard J. Clement, M.D., Lpcf La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
“When the entire record is before the appellate court, remand for a new trial produces delay of the final outcome and congestion of crowded dockets while adding little to the judicial determination process.”
Taylor v. Clement 970 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc. 970 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Richard v. BD. OF SUPER. OF LA. STATE UNIV. 960 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 951 So. 2d 138 La. 2007
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
Lam Ex Rel Lam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins 946 So. 2d 133 La. 2006
(1975), discusses and reaffirms the constitutional power of an appellate court to decide a case, de novo, on the record when the jury verdict must be set aside and given no weight because of trial court error.
LEFEBVRE v. Grigsby 940 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Cooksey v. Stewart 938 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Conversely, defendant contends the ruling was correct, , (1969), rev'd on other grounds by Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 254 La.
Winston v. Millaud 930 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Roberts v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., 94-1252, p. 4 (La.2/20/95), ( ).
Albert L. Roberts, Jr., Et Ux. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
Capitol Anesthesia Group, P.A. v. Gus Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
As minor a decision as this might seem to be, the record on appeal contains no evidence confirming Mr. Watson’s agreement to pay one-half of the costs such that we could make an independent determination, and decide the matter.
Capitol Anesthesia Group, P.A. v. Watson 923 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
As minor a decision as this might seem to be, the record on appeal contains no evidence confirming Mr. Watson’s agreement to pay one-half of the costs such that we could make an independent determination, and decide the matter.
Distinguished Long v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 916 So. 2d 87 La. 2005
ST. ANDREWS PLACE v. City of Shreveport 914 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Co., 94-1252 (La.02/20/95), , revd in part, on other grounds, 96-3028 (La.07/01/97), , reh'g denied, 96-3028 (La.09/19/97), ; writ denied
In Re JBA 914 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
A.C., supra, citing Gonzales v. Xerox, Corp.
In the Interest of J.B.A. 914 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
A.C., supra, citing Gonzales v. Xerox, Corp.
Balseiro v. Castaneda-Zuniga 916 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Distinguished Long v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 916 So. 2d 87 La. 2005
Lam Ex Rel. Lam v. State Farm Auto. Ins. 901 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95), , revd in part, on other grounds, 96-3028 (La.7/1/97), , reh'g denied, 96-3028 (La.9/19/97), ; See also
Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co. 895 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 1/23/02), , writ denied, 02-1325 (La.9/13/02), citing Jones v. Black, 95-2530 (La.6/28/96)
Delton Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Scheurmann v. Foti 894 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Forum for Equality PAC v. McKeithen 893 So. 2d 715 La. 2005
Lawson v. MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES 896 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
art. 2164; Gordon v. Willis Knighton Med.
Kevin Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
art. 2164; Gordon v. Willis Knighton Med.
Payne v. Tonti Realty Corp. 888 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
If the verdict or judgment is clearly contrary to the law and the evidence, we can make that determination on this appeal and grant relief, without having to order a new trial, (La.App.
Certified Capital Corp. v. Reis 897 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004