Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 320 So. 2d 163.
-
NORTHWEST LA PRODUCTION CREDIT v. State
746 So. 2d 280
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State, Through Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission v. Louisiana State Police Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 95-2355, p. 5 (La.
- Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co. 758 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
Taylor v. Taylor
739 So. 2d 256
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Franklin & Moore v. Gilsbar, Inc., 95-1520 (La.App.
-
James v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc.
736 So. 2d 353
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
It claims that this evidence and testimony tainted the jurors' minds and asks that we make a
- Baxter v. Sonat Offshore Drilling, Inc. 734 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-
Morin v. Foret
736 So. 2d 279
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
(providing for appellate de novo review of a trial court's legal error).
- Cash v. McGregor 730 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
Billiot v. Terrebonne Sheriff's Office
735 So. 2d 17
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
The general rule, is that where an erroneous jury instruction is given that constitutes reversible error, the jury decision should be thrown out and the appellate court should undertake a de novo review of the record and implement its own judgment based on the evidence.
-
Valley v. Specialty Restaurant Corp.
726 So. 2d 1028
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
see also Manieri, supra ; Davis, supra .
- Wilson v. PNS Stores, Inc. 725 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
Richardson v. State
726 So. 2d 417
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
However, in Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., *420 the supreme court held that when a trial court committed reversible legal error and the entire record is before the appellate court, the appellate court is required to review the case de novo and render a judgment on the merits.
- Guidry v. Hedburg 722 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
Hardisty v. Young
720 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
art. 2164 and its progeny, to decide cases on appeal whenever the record makes it possible.
- Ibieta v. Star Casino, Inc. 720 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
Echo, Inc. v. Power Equipment Distributors, Inc.
719 So. 2d 79
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Franklin & Moore v. Gilsbar, Inc., 95-1520 (La.App.
- Pommier v. ABC Ins. Co. 715 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
Chaisson v. Oceanside Seafood
713 So. 2d 1286
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc., (La.App.
- Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- Bogan v. O'Connor 703 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Lemoine v. Harris Management Co. 702 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Nalle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 702 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- Williams v. Golden 699 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- Kavanaugh v. Long 698 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Niklaus v. Bellina 696 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer 698 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-
Hirsch v. Cahn Elec. Co., Inc.
694 So. 2d 636
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
When a complete record is before the court of appeal
-
Morris & Dickson Co. v. Jones Brothers Co., Inc.
691 So. 2d 882
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Savelle v. Heilbrunn, supra ; Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., supra ; Parrino v. Royal Ins.
- Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Yeargin, Inc. 690 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- Urban Homeowners' Corp. v. Abrams 692 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corp. v. Walsh Bros.-Gahagan Ltd. 692 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
Trahan v. McManus
689 So. 2d 696
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., -75 (La.App.
- In Interest of ECB 691 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Helena Chemical Co. v. Nichols 695 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center
686 So. 2d 955
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
art. 2164; Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical Center, 27,044 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/21/95), , writ denied 95-2776 (La.1/26/96), .
-
Barnco Intern., Inc. v. Arkla, Inc.
684 So. 2d 986
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Co., 94-1252 (La.02/20/95), ; see also Smith v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 26,180 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/22/94), , writ denied, 95-0035 (La.03/10/95), .
- O'ROURKE v. Cairns 683 So. 2d 697 La. 1996
- Moore v. Safeway, Inc. 700 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Yeargin, Inc. 682 So. 2d 747 La. 1996
-
Washington v. Lyons Specialty Co.
683 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Gentile, 665 So.2d at 431 ; Johnson, 636 So.2d at 916
-
Knapper v. Connick
681 So. 2d 944
La. 1996
(1969), overruled on other grounds
- Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans. and Dev. 680 So. 2d 1154 La. 1996
- Holt v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 680 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
STATE THRU. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N v. Louisiana State Police Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div.
694 So. 2d 316
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc., (La.App.
- State v. Simien 677 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Jones v. Black 676 So. 2d 1067 La. 1996
-
Pendleton v. Barrett
675 So. 2d 720
La. 1996
[12] Because of the unique procedural posture of this case, that is, an incomplete trial against the original defendants resulted in a settlement which triggered claims against the PCF which gave rise to the legal issues we visit herein, which cautions against remand to the trial court when the court of appeal has the full record before it.
-
Franklin & Moore v. Gilsbar, Inc.
673 So. 2d 658
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc., (La.App.
-
Succession of Jurisich
694 So. 2d 928
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
However, appears to dictate that this court decide these issues for the first time on appeal.
- Boutte v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 674 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Andrus v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 670 So. 2d 1206 La. 1996