Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 320 So. 2d 163.

600 citing documents.

LeBlanc v. Continental Grain Co., Inc. 672 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Olivier v. LeJeune 668 So. 2d 347 La. 1996
Wooley v. EJD Builders, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Tanner v. International Maintenance Corp., supra
Clement v. Frey 666 So. 2d 607 La. 1996
Tomas v. Conco Food Distributors 666 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 694 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Wilson v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. OF LOUISIANA 665 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Fuller v. United States Aircraft, supra.
Regional Transit Authority v. Lemoine 664 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Lemoine contends that the jury was improperly charged, the verdict should be reversed, and this Court should make a
Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 661 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Triche v. Regional Elec. & Const., Inc. 671 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Guillory v. State Farm Ins. Co. 662 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace 661 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Ayres v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 663 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Davis v. Borskey 660 So. 2d 17 La. 1995
Lewis v. Hayes 659 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
IP Timberlands Operating Co. v. Denmiss Corp. 657 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Stark v. National Tea Co. 655 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
to review the record in its entirety and quantify the appropriate amount of fault for each party.
Young v. Logue 660 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Martinez v. Schumpert Medical Center 655 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Jones v. St. Francis Cabrini Hosp. 652 So. 2d 1331 La. 1995
Olivier v. LeJeune 649 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd. 650 So. 2d 712 La. 1995
Simon v. Fasig-Tipton Co. 652 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 650 So. 2d 742 La. 1995
Hoyt v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp. 651 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-166 (La.1975); Myers v. American Seating Company, 93-1350 (La.App.
Succession of Christensen 649 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Jarreau v. Hirschey 650 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Abadie v. City of Westwego 646 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Having reviewed the portions of the record that are relevant to the sole issue before us, there is no question but that the jury’s award of general damages falls below the lowest permissible limit, which an examination of the complete record before us requires us, to fix at $125,000.00.
In Re Viviano 645 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
we will review the evidence de novo as to the claim for invasion of privacy.
Smith v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 645 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
In re C.B. 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
Leyva v. Iberia General Hosp. 643 So. 2d 1236 La. 1994
In Re CB, Applying for Adoption 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
Chatelain v. Circle K Corp. 644 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Rosell v. ESCO, supra ; Collier v. Southern Builders, Inc., (La.App.
Rivere v. Union Pacific R. Co. 647 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Francisco v. Harris Management Co. 643 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Band v. First Bankcard Center 644 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
we have conducted a de novo review of the evidence, outlined hereinabove.
Davis v. Borskey 643 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Nigreville v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Co. 642 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
We reversed and, undertook a de novo review of the issues presented.
Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 638 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
App. 1st Cir.1974), aff., in part, reversed in part, on other grounds, (La.
Williams v. General Motors Corp. 639 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Since we have found trial error, which requires an appellate court to decide the case when the record permits.
Laneaux v. Opelousas Artificial Kidney Center 640 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
l2(La.1975), we decide the remaining issues: we find that the claimant was rendered temporarily totally disabled and award benefits accordingly; we find that the claimant has incurred medical expenses and we award those; we find that the defendants were arbitrary and capricious in denying benefits and award penalties
Trimble v. Hadco Services, Inc. 640 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Shumate v. Little Caesars, Inc. 640 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Menard v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 640 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Snia v. United Medical Center 637 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Myers v. American Seating Co. 637 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-66 (La.1975), the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed de novo review of the merits by appellate courts: While the trial court remains the original forum for resolving factual and legal issues, the Louisiana Constitution expressly *779 extends the jurisdiction of appellate courts in civil cases to the review of fact
Carmen v. Gonzalez 637 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Manuel v. Wal-Mart Stores 640 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994