Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 320 So. 2d 163.

600 citing documents.

Johnson v. Vinson Guard Service, Inc. 636 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Odom v. Colonel Sanders Kentucky Fried Chicken 636 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
The general rule, is that where an erroneous jury instruction is given that constitutes reversible error, the jury decision should be thrown out and the appellate court should undertake a de novo review of the record and implement its own judgment based on the evidence.
Oswalt v. STATE, DOTD 640 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Beoh v. Watkins 635 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins.
Kibble v. BPO Elks Lodge No. 30 640 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Clement v. Griffin 634 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
See Gonzales v. Xerox, Corp.
Jones v. Merritt 633 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Graves v. Lou Ana Foods, Inc., (La.App.
Musso v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 632 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
American Southern Home Insurance Co. v. Guidry 631 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite 630 So. 2d 706 La. 1994
Guilfore v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 631 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Dodson v. Walker 630 So. 2d 247 La. 1994
Kennedy v. St. Charles General Hosp. Auxiliary 630 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Dye v. SCHWEGMANN BROS. SUPERMARKETS 627 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
McDonough v. Royal Sonesta, Inc. 626 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Weeks v. TL James & Co. Inc. 626 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Dupuy v. Rodriguez 620 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Burdis v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury 618 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Young v. Armadores De Cabotaje, SA 617 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
If we found that the trial court erred in denying the motion for remittitur, (L.a 1975), to remand for a new trial on the issue of damages when the facts are before us. The jury awarded plaintiff $1,700,000.00 in damages, itemized as follows: *537 Future medical expenses; [6] $ 300,000.00 Past physical and mental pain and suffering and disability from date of accident to date of trial; $ 325,0
Barnes v. Bott 615 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Furthermore, recognizing the constitutional authority of an appellate court to make factual determinations based on the entire record (), we have assigned the amount of damages to be awarded each party.
Johnson v. Lowes of Louisiana, Inc. 627 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lantier v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 614 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
in the interest of judicial economy, we are obligated to decide the merits of the remaining issues in this case.
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 615 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
The Supreme Court ordered us to decide the case, (La.
Mathews v. Mathews 614 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Gray v. Texaco, Inc. 610 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Funk v. Louisiana Underwriters Insurance Co. 613 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Moreover, Article 2164 of the Code of Civil Procedure defines the scope of appellate review as follows: “The appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal.”
Guillory v. City of Lake Charles 614 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Rigaud v. Deruise 613 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Thumfart v. Lombard 613 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. v. Luber-Finer, Inc. 612 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Gunn v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co. 611 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
As ordered by the Louisiana Supreme Court
Hughes v. Green 609 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
See, -166 (La.1975); Clay-Dutton, (La.App.
Dye v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 607 So. 2d 564 La. 1992
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of New Orleans 606 So. 2d 524 La. 1992
Thibodeaux v. Stivers 609 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Therefore, we set aside the judgment of the trial court and render judgment based on a
Donaldson v. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING, OF MAPLEWOOD, INC. 606 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1987), writ denied
Gunn v. Amica Insurance Co. 604 So. 2d 957 La. 1992
Gunn v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. 604 So. 2d 958 La. 1992
Graves v. Lou Ana Foods, Inc. 604 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. 602 So. 2d 1003 La. 1992
the district court's judgment is therefore not entitled to the usual deference on appellate *1008 review.
Tanner v. International Maintenance Corp. 602 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Thibaut v. Thibaut 607 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Doe v. ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS 602 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1974), aff'd in part, rev'd in part on other grounds
Martin v. Francis 600 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Gunn v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. 600 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
The general rule, is where an erroneous jury instruction is given that constitutes reversible error, the jury decision should be thrown out and the appellate court should undertake a de novo review of the record and implement its own judgment based on a preponderance of the evidence.
Fontenot v. Cooper 599 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Hickman v. Albertson's, Inc. 598 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Mitchell v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 596 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Mitchell v. STATE, THROUGH DOTD 596 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Willis v. LeTulle 597 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
*460 This is not to say, and Gonzales [ v. Xerox Corporation, ] [(La.