Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Jones-Journet, 320 So. 2d 533.

75 citing documents.

Lee & Perles, L.L.P. Formerly Known as Lee, Futrell & Perles, L.L.P., Gary A. Lee and Richard M. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 (La.3/9/07) (footnote omitted), our supreme court has set forth the following relative to such a nullity action: In Johnson v. Jones–Journet, this Court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Tracy Alexander v. State of La; Dept. of Children & Family Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
art. 2004, the supreme court has explained: In Johnson v. Jones–Journet, this Court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Alexander v. State 249 So. 3d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
art. 2004, the supreme court has explained: In Johnson v. Jones-Journet , this Court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Sork v. Sork 242 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3d Cir. App. 1985) ( , 536 (La.
Aguillard v. Chatman 239 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/6/06), , 670 ), our supreme court addressed a nullity action, explaining: In Johnson v. Jones-Journet , this Court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Caleb Kent Aguillard v. John Christopher Chatman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
9/6/06), ), our supreme court addressed a nullity action, explaining: this Court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3/9/07) (footnote omitted), our supreme court has set forth the following relative to such a nullity action: this Court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. 189 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, pp. 12-13 (La.3/9/07) (footnote omitted), our supreme court has set forth the following relative to such a nullity action: this Court reviewed the historical' development of C.C.P.
Ezzell v. Miranne 185 So. 3d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc.
Armstrong Airport Concessions v. K-Squared Restaurant, LLC 178 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wilson v. Wilson 170 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Louisiana, the common law term "joint and several” is considered synonymous with the civil law term "in solido," or "solidary liability.” (La.
Succession of Frank Bernat La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Succession of Bernat 123 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Parker, ; n. 4 (La.1975).
Robinson v. Nunly 69 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
The criteria set forth for annulling a : [H]owever; the jurisprudence set forth two criteria, to determine whether a judgment had, in fact, been obtained by actionable fraud or ill practices: (1) the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered showed the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant seeking relief, and (2) the enforceme
Cadle Co. v. Henson 57 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
Jcp Investments, LLC v. Mable Lee Thomas Champ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2004 provides “[a] final judgment obtained by fraud or ill practices may be annulled.” the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the historical development of La.Code Civ.P.
Duckworth Properties, L.L.C. v. Williams 52 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
To determine whether a judgment has been obtained by actionable fraud or ill practices, it must be shown that: “(1) the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered showed the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant seeking relief, and (2) the enforcement of the judgment would have been unconscionable and inequitable.”
Mike v. Bob's Painting 995 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Minton v. LONG'S PREFERRED PRODUCTS, INC. 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In finding that the Appellants were not entitled to have the 2001 judgment annulled, the trial court found that they failed to meet the "deprivation of legal rights"
Linda K. Minton v. Long's Preferred Products, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In finding that the Appellants were not entitled to have the 2001 judgment annulled, the trial court found that they failed to meet the “deprivation of legal rights”
Kelda Wells v. Melvin Price La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 951 So. 2d 1058 La. 2007
this Court reviewed the historical development of C.C.P.
Power Marketing Direct, Inc. v. Foster 938 So. 2d 662 La. 2006
this Court, in examining La.Code Civ.
Payne v. Glass 939 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
2d Cir.9/23/98), , writ not considered, 1998-2704 (La.12/18/98)
Descant v. Herrera 890 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., 392 So .2d 398, 401-402 (La.1980)
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERV. v. Cormier 841 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., (La.
Calcasieu Parish School Bd. v. Parker 827 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Bank One v. SWC CORP. 823 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Berlier v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 815 So. 2d 39 La. 2002
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. 800 So. 2d 762 La. 2001
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc.
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Foret v. Terrebonne, Ltd., 93-676, p. 3 (La.App.
Livingston Parish v. Millers Mut. Fire 767 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Russland Enterprises v. City of Gretna 727 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. Robinson 718 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
the two criteria set forth in our jurisprudence to determine whether a judgment had been obtained by actionable fraud or ill practices.
Edelman v. New Orleans Saints 656 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Collins v. Estrade 638 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Foret v. Terrebone, Ltd. 631 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Touchard v. Williams 617 So. 2d 885 La. 1993
Garland v. Coreil, 134 So.
Homer Nat. Bank v. Nix 566 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield, supra.
Rayne State Bank and Trust Co. v. Fruge 546 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
In Johnson v. *641 Jones-Journet, the court recognized that actionable fraud or ill practice is found when the circumstances under which the judgment is rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the party seeking relief and enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable.
Design Associates, Inc. v. Charpentier 537 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
EVANGELINE FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN v. Catha 520 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Phillips v. Patin 517 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Spencer v. Carroll, 506 So.
Babin v. Babin 511 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Spencer v. Carroll 506 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Hong v. Lucien 505 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Moreland v. Green 501 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Gavin v. Superior Applicators, Inc., (La.App.
Chaisson v. Daigle 499 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The common law term ‘joint and several’ has been held synonymous with our civil law term ‘in solido.’ (La.App.