Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 322 So. 2d 177.

20 citing documents.

  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    2213 , 48 L.Ed.2d 822 (1976); (La.
  • State v. Hoofkin 596 So. 2d 536 La. 1992
    2213 , 48 L.Ed.2d 822 (1976)
  • State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    mporaneous objection rule was applied post-verdict to polling of a jury, a motion for a new trial, a presentence investigation, [3] and excessive sentences, and their progeny.
  • State v. Young 472 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Overruled State v. Terriault 369 So. 2d 125 La. 1979
  • State v. Cox 369 So. 2d 118 La. 1979
  • State v. Lee 364 So. 2d 1024 La. 1978
  • State v. Dudley 362 So. 2d 507 La. 1978
    See State v. Williams, La., (1975).
  • State v. Fisher 362 So. 2d 553 La. 1978
    See State v. Williams, La., (1975).
  • State v. Proctor 354 So. 2d 488 La. 1977
    841, 920; (concurring opinion).
  • State v. Dickerson 353 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
  • State v. Jones 347 So. 2d 200 La. 1977
    See State v. Dillard, La., (1975); State v. Williams, La., (1975).
  • State v. Williams 340 So. 2d 1382 La. 1976
  • State v. Hill 340 So. 2d 309 La. 1976
  • State v. Badon 338 So. 2d 665 La. 1976
    In State v. Williams, La., (1975), this Court rejected an identical contention, stating: "There is no substance to this argument.
  • State v. Anthony 332 So. 2d 214 La. 1976
  • State v. Bullock 329 So. 2d 733 La. 1976
    In regard to the assertion that the Habitual Offender Law is unconstitutional, : .
  • State v. Walker 328 So. 2d 87 La. 1976
    See State v. Williams, La., (decided October 1, 1975) and authorities cited therein.
  • State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 828 La. 1976
    4 (La.1975) (decided October 1, 1975); fn.
  • State v. Clark 325 So. 2d 802 La. 1976