State v. Hoofkin
State v. Hoofkin, 596 So. 2d 536 (La. 1992).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Alexis Sarrabea La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Sarrabea 157 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State of Louisiana v. David F. Pittman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- In the Matter of State Ex Rel. Lw 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State ex rel. L.W. 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Romero 977 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- State ex rel. T.E. 787 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Hodge 781 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Stephenson 766 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Green 493 So. 2d 588
- State v. Lee 364 So. 2d 1024
- State v. Wrestle, Inc. 360 So. 2d 831
- State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 828
- State v. Williams 322 So. 2d 177
- State v. Dillard 320 So. 2d 116
Opinion text
596 So.2d 536 (1992) STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby HOOFKIN. No. 92-K-0290. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 20, 1992. PER CURIAM. Granted in part; denied in part. This case is remanded to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal for consideration of the defendant's challenge to the facial validity of LSA-R.S. 14:130.1. This court has consistently held that the facial unconstitutionality of a statute on which a conviction is based is an error discoverable by the mere inspection of pleadings and proceedings, without inspection of the evidence, which is subject to appellate review under LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 920, even though the defendant did not raise the issue in the trial court and did not comply with the assignment of error procedure in LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 844 or with the contemporaneous objection rule of LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841. State v. Green, 493 So.2d 588, 590 (La.1986); State v. Lee, 364 So.2d 1024 (La.1978); State v. Wrestle, Inc., 360 So.2d 831 (La.1978); State v. Stewart, 325 So.2d 828 (La.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 997 , 96 S.Ct. 2213 , 48 L.Ed.2d 822 (1976); State v. Williams, 322 So.2d 177 (La.1975); State v. Dillard, 320 So.2d 116 (La.1975). In all other respects the application is denied.