DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dillard, 320 So. 2d 116.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    the defendant was found guilty of murdering one police officer and of the attempted murder of two other officers.
  • State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    the defendant was found guilty of murdering one police officer and of the attempted murder of two other officers.
  • State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    1976) (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (La.
  • State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • State v. Greco 862 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • State v. Bradford 846 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • State v. Langley 813 So. 2d 356 La. 2002
    See Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/96), ("Counsel must assert the equal protection claim in a pre-trial motion to quash or waive any complaint in that regard"); (La.
  • State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    2213 , 48 L.Ed.2d 822 (1976); State v. Williams, 322 So.2d *577 177 (La.1975)
  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hampton 687 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Deloch v. Whitley 684 So. 2d 349 La. 1996
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • State v. Hoofkin 596 So. 2d 536 La. 1992
    2213 , 48 L.Ed.2d 822 (1976)
  • State v. Vailes 564 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Holley 528 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Donahue 408 So. 2d 1262 La. 1982
  • State v. Mallett 357 So. 2d 1105 La. 1978
  • State v. Matthews 354 So. 2d 552 La. 1978
    cert, denied, 421 U.S. 916 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lewis 353 So. 2d 703 La. 1977
  • State v. Forbes 348 So. 2d 983 La. 1977
    19, 1976; State v. Bell, [La., (1975)]
  • State v. Jones 347 So. 2d 200 La. 1977
    See State v. Dillard, La., (1975); State v. Williams, La., (1975).
  • State v. Bell 346 So. 2d 1090 La. 1977
  • State v. De La Beckwith 344 So. 2d 360 La. 1977
  • State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
    State v. Stewart, supra; State v. Bell, supra.
  • State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 208 La. 1976
  • State v. Morris 340 So. 2d 195 La. 1976
  • State v. Ledet 337 So. 2d 1126 La. 1976
  • State v. Smith 332 So. 2d 459 La. 1976
  • State v. Berry 329 So. 2d 728 La. 1976
    19, 1976; State v. Bell, supra
  • State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 828 La. 1976
  • State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 819 La. 1976
  • State v. Rogers 324 So. 2d 403 La. 1975
    art. 920(2), as amended, La.Acts 1974, No. 207, § 1