Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nix, 327 So. 2d 301.

104 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Oderra Benitez Holmes La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/6/05), this court stated as follows: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Donasty Anwanique Cohen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Cohen 272 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Nix , , 326 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
State v. Broadway 252 So. 3d 878 La. 2018
2562 , 2568, 33 L.Ed.2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Nix , , 320 (La.
State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Nix , , 340 (La.
State v. Willie 235 So. 3d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Derrick A. Dotson La. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Darrin Kashy Duhon -Aka- Darrin Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/6/05), this court stated as follows: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” 3 (La.1975); State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96)
State v. Duhon 224 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/6/05), , this court stated as follows: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/6/05), which explains: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96)
State v. Black 33 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/15/04), , writ denied, 05-231 (La.5/6/05), , which explains: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a *1031 ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), .
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
Martin at p. 1, 769 So.2d at 1169; , 323 La.
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
Martin at p. 1 , 769 So.2d at 1169
State v. Paul 924 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
the supreme court found there was no need to transcribe the court's charge where the trial court's written charges were included in the record and where the trial judge in a per curiam, indicated that he read the written charges that he had prepared to the jury.
State of Louisiana v. John Joseph Normand La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.
State v. Normand 896 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), .
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
Martin at p. 1 , 769 So.2d at 1169
State v. Carter 814 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Hunt 797 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Carter 762 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Arnold, supra; cert.
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
State v. McBroom 655 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Allen 633 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Knighten 609 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Loyden 597 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 596 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Kennedy 584 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
if the record is to reflect whether a particular defendant exhausted his peremptory challenges ...”
State v. Lott 574 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Goins 568 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Kotwitz 549 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Saddler 538 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 534 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Jones 526 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Haynes 514 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 499 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Watson 484 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Hamilton 481 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Wilkerson, supra; cert.
State v. Wilson 469 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985