Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marcell, 320 So. 2d 195.

62 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Dale Dwayne Craig La. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamel Malik La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    -80 (La.1976); State v. Reed, 97-606 812, p. 19 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald W. Dahlem 197 So. 3d 676 La. 2016
    ccurrence.”); (“[A]n irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.”); ("In the absence of a contemporaneous objection, an alleged error or irregularity in the proceedings cannot be availed of after the verdict is rendered.”); (“By failing to make a timely objection, a defendant waives his right to subsequently attack the judgment of conviction on grounds of error or irregularity.”).
  • State of Louisiana v. Asa Bentley AKA - Asa N. Bentley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
    Const, art. 1,1 ¡,§ 19 guarantees that “[n]o person shall be subjected to imprisonment or forfeiture of rights or property without the right of judicial review,” the article also provides without qualification that this right “may be intelligently waived.” The right of waiver is personal to the defendant, and the waiver “must be an informed one.”
  • State v. Rabun 880 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Williams 878 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. James 761 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; *132 , writ denied, 94-2712 (La.6/30/95); ().
  • State v. Sorenson 725 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    -80 (La.1976); State v. Reed, 97-812, *606 p. 19 (La.App.
  • State v. Reed 712 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    State v. Denomes, 95-1201, p. 8 (La.App.
  • Distinguished State v. Gonzales 680 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Likewise, wherein the Court stated that the right to an appeal is personal to a defendant and that any waiver of this right must be made by the defendant are also distinguishable The appellant contends that because she did not specifically waive her right to appeal, the appeal should have proceeded even in her absenc
  • State v. Denomes 674 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Dugar 643 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Wallace 602 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Williams 591 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Jones 588 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Thompson 569 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Rodriguez 554 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Augustine 555 So. 2d 1331 La. 1990
  • State v. Williams 554 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Keltner 542 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Perkins 539 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hersman 511 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Arvel 481 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Counterman 461 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Hughes v. State 451 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Parrish 434 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Thomas 427 So. 2d 428 La. 1983
    State v. Morris , 82-KA-0549, rendered this day
  • State v. Morris 429 So. 2d 111 La. 1983
  • State v. Tonubbee 420 So. 2d 126 La. 1982
  • State v. Elizey 407 So. 2d 1204 La. 1981
  • State v. Darby 403 So. 2d 44 La. 1981
  • State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
    at 198: "The contemporaneous objection rule, as embodied in Article 841 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, is necessary in order to promote judicial efficiency and in order to prevent a defendant from gambling for a favorable verdict and then, upon conviction, resorting to appeal on errors that mi
  • State v. Simmons 390 So. 2d 504 La. 1980
  • State v. Myles 389 So. 2d 12 La. 1980
  • State v. Fontenot 356 So. 2d 1385 La. 1978
  • State v. Alexander 351 So. 2d 505 La. 1977
    State v. Marcell, supra [ ]."
  • State v. Collins 350 So. 2d 590 La. 1977
  • State v. Anthony 347 So. 2d 483 La. 1977
    State v. Ross, La., (1977); State v. Mouton, La., (1976); State v. Marcell, La., (1975).
  • State v. Williams 347 So. 2d 214 La. 1977
  • State v. Lee 346 So. 2d 682 La. 1977
  • State v. Lee 343 So. 2d 1060 La. 1977
    [3] State v. Dotson, 260 La.
  • State v. McMorris 343 So. 2d 1011 La. 1977
  • State v. Tyler 342 So. 2d 574 La. 1977
    A at which time the issue was resolved in these words: "Notwithstanding the foregoing, counsel for defendant argues that under the provisions of Article 1, § 19 of the Louisiana Constitution of 19742 defendant is 2 Article 1, § 19 provides in pertinent part: `No person shall be subjected to imprisonment or fo
  • State v. Fields 342 So. 2d 624 La. 1977
    : "Notwithstanding the foregoing, counsel for defendant argues that under the provisions of Article 1, § 19 of the Louisiana Constitution of 19742 defendant is 2 Article 1, § 19 provides in pertinent part: `No person shall be subjected to imprisonment or forfeiture of rights or property without the right of j