Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Loescher v. Parr, 324 So. 2d 441.

515 citing documents.

Dorthlon v. ST. FRANCIS MED. CENTER 677 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Summerall v. Ouachita Parish School Bd., 27,643 (La.App.
Mix v. Krewe of Petronius 675 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a tree growing on defendant's lot, which damaged plaintiff's car, was in the lot owner's custody, noting in a footnote: In Verlander, We are Responsible ..., 2 Tulane Civil Law Forum, No. 2, p. 64 (1974), which contains a perceptive and thorough analysis of the French
Buchert v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF REC. & TOURISM 669 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Gonzales v. Acadiana Fast Foods, Inc. 670 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Summerall v. Ouachita Parish School Bd. 665 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Harig v. State, Board of Secondary and Elementary Education, supra.
White v. Louviere 664 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Carter v. Exide Corp. 661 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
King of Hearts, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 660 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Akerman v. Dawes 658 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
449 n. 7 (La.1975); (La.App.
Martinez v. Schumpert Medical Center 655 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Billiot v. State 654 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
n. 7 (La.1975), Justice Tate quoted with approval the following language on the question of what constitutes “custody” for purposes of liability: “[T]he things in one’s care are those things to which one bears such a relationship as to have the right of direction and control over them, and to draw some kind of b
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California 652 So. 2d 1299 La. 1995
Elder v. Rowe 653 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 653 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Touchet v. Estate of Bass 653 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Rabito v. Otis Elevator Co. 648 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Girvan v. New Orleans Pub. Serv. Inc. 646 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a strictly liable defendant's fault may be absolved "only if the thing owned by him fails, not because of its defect, but rather because of the fault of some third person...."
Olivier v. Boudreaux 649 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., supra; Olsen v. Shell Oil Co., supra [ ]; Loescher v. Parr, supra [ ].
Baudoin v. McDermott, Inc. 644 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Delery v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 643 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Wiggins on Behalf of Wiggins v. Ledet 643 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
at 1148 , -47 (La.1975).
Lewis v. State 642 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Buffinet v. Plaquemines Parish Com'n 645 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Theriot v. Lasseigne 640 So. 2d 1305 La. 1994
DeRouen v. Audirsch 639 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Murray v. Griffin 640 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Manuel v. Wal-Mart Stores 640 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
To illustrate this, (La.
Prestenbach v. Louisiana Power & Light 638 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Faul v. Bank of Sunset & Trust Co. 635 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Lee v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 635 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Harig v. State, Bd. of Elementary & Secondary Educ. 635 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Aufrichtig v. Progressive Men's Club 634 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
interpreted things in one's custody as follows: [T]he things in one's care are those things to which one bears such a relationship as to have the right of direction and control over them, and to draw some kind of benefit from them.
Guillory v. Foster 634 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Rabito v. Otis Elevator Co. 633 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
art. 2317; Spott, supra ; (La.App.
Tucker v. Pinder 631 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Rosenblath's, Inc. v. Evans 628 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Thomas v. Richard 624 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
which held that Article 2317 provides for strict liability for damages caused by defects in a thing under the custody of an individual.
Fontenot v. Fontenot 621 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Goza v. Cornwell 622 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
This court rendered in Loescher [v. Parr, ] what it plainly considered to be a fundamental judgment using civilian and comparatist methodology to combine diverse conceptions into a coherent principle giving strict liability manageable scope and harmonizing its several categories.
Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
Boyd v. WASHINGTON-ST. TAMMANY ELEC. CO-OP. 618 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Sampson v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
Guild v. City of New Orleans 617 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Chaisson v. J.J.D. Inc. 613 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Brewhouse, Ltd. v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 614 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Thumfart v. Lombard 613 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Bergeron v. Southeastern Louisiana University 610 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Pool v. City of Shreveport 607 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bradford v. Louisiana Downs, Inc. 606 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bertini v. Turncliff 607 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992