Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Loescher v. Parr, 324 So. 2d 441.
-
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety
620 So. 2d 1172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
449 n. 7 (La.1975) appears the following: 7.
-
Smith v. Roan
605 So. 2d 10
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Professor William E. Crawford commented in a law review article that "[U]nder Loescher [v. Parr, (La.
-
Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.
601 So. 2d 1355
La. 1992
Loescher v. Parr, [ ] (quoting Verlander, We Are Responsible ...
-
Rivet v. LeBlanc
600 So. 2d 1358
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In *1367 , 449 n. 7 (La.1975) appears the following: 7.
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Simon 598 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Bealer v. National Tea Co. 597 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Smith v. American Indem. Ins. Co. 598 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
Taylor v. Holiday Inn, Inc.
595 So. 2d 735
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
As pointed out by the trial judge, to prevail, appellant must establish that appel-lee had “custody of the defective premises.” (La.
- Arceneaux v. Daggett 594 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Watson v. City of New Orleans 593 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Lafont v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. 593 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Durkee v. City of Shreveport 587 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Orleans Parish School Bd. v. City of New Orleans 585 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Epps v. Society of the Holy Family 583 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Oster v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 582 So. 2d 1285 La. 1991
-
Socorro v. City of New Orleans
579 So. 2d 931
La. 1991
see also Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
- Coleman v. Otis Elevator Co. 582 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Calmes v. American Bankers Insurance Co. 580 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Blanchard v. Republic Insurance Group
576 So. 2d 1226
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
(5th Cir.1988), writ denied
- Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co. 576 So. 2d 461 La. 1991
- Stovall v. Shell Oil Co. 577 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- US F&G v. Hi-Tower Concrete Pumping Service 574 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Sipco v. Concordia Electric Co-operative, Inc. 571 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Harris v. Agrico Chemical Co. 570 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Hopkins v. Travasos 569 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Davenport v. Amax Nickel, Inc. 569 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Parker v. Boise Southern Co. 570 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Maples v. Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 567 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Williams v. Markel Lumber Co. 566 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Jones v. Gillen 564 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
560 So. 2d 684
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
citing Loescher v. Parr, [ ].
- Langley v. Oxford Chemicals, Inc. 559 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd.
561 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
449 n. 7 (La.1975), the Supreme Court defined Article 2317 "custody:" The things in one's care are those things to which one bears such a relationship as *746 to have the right of direction and control over them and to draw some kind of benefit from them.
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 1106 La. 1990
- Davis v. State Farm Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Carr v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 557 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Jones v. Williams 557 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Boyer v. Seal 553 So. 2d 827 La. 1989
- Bell v. State 553 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Jones v. Missouri Pacific Railroad 546 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Daigle v. White 544 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
Trabeau v. MacK Trucks, Inc.
543 So. 2d 1381
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Rodrigue v. Dixilyn Corp., 620 F.2d 537 (5th Cir.1980).
- Smiley v. Sikes 543 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- King v. Louviere 543 So. 2d 1327 La. 1989
-
LeBlanc v. Hullinghorst Industries, Inc.
542 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
the court discussed the concept of custody as the basis of legal fault without negligence.
- Kuykendall v. Circle, Inc. 539 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Williams v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 541 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Giddings v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 539 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
-
Whitney v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
540 So. 2d 970
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Art. 2317 which states: “We aife responsible, not only for the damage occasioned by our own act, but for that which is caused by the act of persons for whom we are answerable, or of the things which we have in our custody ...” as follows: “When harm results from the conduct or defect of a person or thing which creates an unreasonable risk of harm to others, a person legally responsible under these code articles [LSA-C.C.
- Williams v. Exxon Corp. 541 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989