DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roach, 322 So. 2d 222.

56 citing documents.

  • State v. REMBLE 38 So. 3d 311 La. 2010
  • State v. Remble 38 So. 3d 311 La. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4/29/94), the fourth circuit discussed whether the language, “my residence or other real estate,” contained in a consent to search form included a shed outside the house, as follows: In support, it [the State] (La.App.
  • State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 2/4/94) , , writ denied, 94-580 (La.4/29/94), , the fourth circuit discussed *1071 whether the language, “ray residence or other real estate,” contained in a consent to search form included a shed outside the house, as follows: In support, it [the State] (La.App.
  • State v. Raborn 771 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Buffington 731 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    97-0020 at p. 4, 707 So.2d at 67 , (La.
  • State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    the Supreme Court stated that a court must employ an objective test to determine the necessity for Miranda warnings.
  • State v. Irby 632 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Garner 621 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. DeCuir 599 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Sylvas 558 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    it had stated that, based on the former language of LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Guidry 496 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Kirsch 488 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Brouillette 465 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hamilton 459 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Camp 459 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Tasker 448 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dunn 446 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Stroud 438 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    held, on page 226, that: [7] "In any event, a search warrant authorizing the search of the `premises' at a stated address must reasonably be interpreted to permit a search of the dwelling house proper, the garage, and any other outbuildings within close proximity of the house proper that one normally associ
  • State v. Ventry 439 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Norman 434 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Cobb 428 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Serrato 424 So. 2d 214 La. 1982
    this court stated that, based on the former language of C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Michel 422 So. 2d 1115 La. 1982
  • State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
  • State v. Thompson 399 So. 2d 1161 La. 1981
  • State v. Hymer 400 So. 2d 637 La. 1981
  • State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
    where this Court indicated its acceptance of similar proof of reliability without requiring a more thorough showing or requiring that prior information has led to convictions.
  • State v. McCathern 395 So. 2d 746 La. 1981
    that the arrests must have resulted in convictions.”
  • State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
    [2] where this Court indicated its acceptance of similar proof of reliability without requiring a more thorough showing or requiring that prior information has led to convictions.
  • State v. Redic 392 So. 2d 451 La. 1980
    See Brown v. Beto, 468 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir. 1972)
  • State v. Baker 389 So. 2d 1289 La. 1980
    741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); State v. Williams, supra
  • State v. Jolla 384 So. 2d 370 La. 1980
    1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
  • State v. Menne 380 So. 2d 14 La. 1980
  • State v. Normand 380 So. 2d 1207 La. 1980
  • State v. Kimble 375 So. 2d 924 La. 1979
    this Court unanimously held: *927 "In any event, a search warrant authorizing the search of the `premises' at a stated address must reasonably be interpreted to permit a search of the dwelling house proper, the garage, and any other outbuildings within close proximity of the house proper that one normally a
  • State v. Walker 369 So. 2d 1345 La. 1979
  • State v. Pittman 368 So. 2d 705 La. 1979
  • State v. Weinberg 364 So. 2d 964 La. 1978
    the affidavit recited that the information supplied by the informant had resulted in sixteen arrests during the previous five months.
  • State v. Richards 357 So. 2d 1128 La. 1978
  • State v. Anderson 357 So. 2d 547 La. 1978
    State v. Ballansaw, La., (1977); State v. Culotta, La., (1976); State v. Sierra, supra; State v. Roach, La., (1975).
  • State v. Segers 355 So. 2d 238 La. 1978
    1 , 553 F.2d 146 (1977); United States v. Harper, 550 F.2d 610 (10th Cir. 1977); United States v. Harvey, 540 F.2d 1345 (8th Cir. 1976)
  • State v. Edwards 354 So. 2d 1322 La. 1978
    State v. Roach, La., (1975); State v. Alford, La., (1975).
  • State v. Smith 350 So. 2d 1178 La. 1977
    State v. Sierra, supra; State v. Roach, La., (1975); State v. Humble, La., (1975); State v. Paciera, supra.
  • State v. Weeks 345 So. 2d 26 La. 1977
  • State v. Tassin 343 So. 2d 681 La. 1977
    State v. Roach, La., (1975).
  • State v. Glover 343 So. 2d 118 La. 1977
  • State v. Brown 340 So. 2d 1306 La. 1976
  • State v. Corey 339 So. 2d 804 La. 1976
    State v. Roach, La., (1975).