Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coleman v. Victor, 326 So. 2d 344.

95 citing documents.

Ngoc Troung v. Marcus Dewayne Sanders and Old American Indemnity Company La. 2025
State Of Louisiana, Et Al. v. Louisiana Land & La. 2022
1993) (“‘[w]hen property is damaged through the legal fault of another, the primary objective is to restore the property as nearly as possible to the state it was in immed iately preceding the damage....’ Coleman v. Victor, [ (La.
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
United States Aircraft Insurance Group v. Global Tower, LLC D/B/A Global Tower Partners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
Earl Ivory v. Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Smith v. Kepney 264 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Coleman v. Victor , (La.
Blake v. City of Port Allen 167 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(affirming the court award of $800 in repair expenses based upon the plaintiff’s uncontradicted testimony); (La.App.
State v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. 110 So. 3d 1038 La. 2013
art. 2315: “Every act whatever of man that causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” This court has held “[o]ne injured through the fault of another is entitled to full indemnification for damages caused thereby.”
LOUTRE LAND AND TIMBER CO. v. Roberts 72 So. 3d 403 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Each case must rest on its own facts and circumstances as supported by the proof in the record.” -347 (La.1976).
Richard Duran Armstrong, Et Ux. v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 10/3/01), ().
Armstrong v. Safeway Insurance Co. 47 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging 902 So. 2d 361 La. 2005
Charles William Massie, III v. Z. David Deloach La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
art. I, § 4; La.Civ.Code art. 2315; all foster the goal of compensating a victim to the full extent of his loss and restoring him to a position as good as he held prior to the damage.
Massie v. Deloach 896 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Const. art. I, § 4; La.Civ.Code art. 2315; all foster the goal of compensating a victim to the full extent of his loss and restoring him to a position as good as he held prior to the damage.
Neloms v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 859 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
2d Cir. 1991), writ denied
Buller v. AMERICAN NAT. PROPERTY & CAS. COS. 838 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-47 (La.1976) (emphasis added) (footnotes omitted): When property is damaged through the legal fault of another, the primary objective is to restore the property as nearly as possible to the state it was in immediately preceding the damage, it is well settled that the measure of damage is the cost of restoring the
Rogers v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 796 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Townsend v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 793 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc. 796 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
The property damage principles found in Louisiana Constitution 1974, Article I, Section 4; Louisiana Civil Code Article 2315; all foster the goal of compensating a victim to the full extent of his loss and restoring him to as good a position as he held prior to the damage.
North American Land Development v. Higginbotham 771 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Industrial Roofing v. Jc Dellinger Mem. 751 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Mossy Motors v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 753 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Berthelot 732 So. 2d 1230 La. 1999
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berthelot 732 So. 2d 1230 La. 1999
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berthelot 709 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
They include “(1) cost of restoration, if the damaged item can be adequately repaired; (2)value differential, difference in value prior to and subsequent to the damage; (3) cost of replacement, less depreciation, if the value before and after the damage cannot be reasonably determined or if the cost of repair is more than the value.” Coleman, n. 4 (La.1976) (citations omitted).
O'RILEY v. City of Shreveport 706 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Smith v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 699 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Alpha Alpha, Inc. v. Southland Aviation 697 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Southern Message Service, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 647 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Davies v. Automotive Cas. Ins. 647 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Abadie v. City of Westwego 646 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
Rosenblath's, Inc. v. Evans 628 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 618 So. 2d 874 La. 1993
Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Hymel 610 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Stoutes v. GMAC 598 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3rd Cir.1988), writ denied
Barr v. Smith 598 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Miller v. Leonard 588 So. 2d 79 La. 1991
Smith v. English 586 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
McDaniel v. DeJean 556 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Taunton v. Cane Air, Inc., (La.App.
Foster v. Craig Equipment Co. 550 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Tesvich v. 3-A's Towing Co. 547 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Humphries v. LA. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIV. OF TRANSP. 545 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Romco, Inc. v. Broussard 528 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Comeaux v. Poindexter 527 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Landry v. State Farm Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. DEPT. OF LABOR, OFFICE OF EMP. SECURITY 527 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
App. 1st Cir.1975), writ denied, this court stated as follows: As we review the matter, the broad purpose of the unemployment law (Louisiana Employment Security Law) is to provide a measure of economic security to workers who are unemployed merely because there are not enough jobs to go around; LSA-R.S.
Day v. Warren 524 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
White v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 527 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988