DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stewart, 325 So. 2d 828.

19 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Alexis Sarrabea La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sarrabea 157 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    cert, denied, 425 U.S. 997 , 96 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., cert.
  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., cert.
  • State v. Flores 669 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hoofkin 596 So. 2d 536 La. 1992
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., cert.
  • State v. Green 493 So. 2d 588 La. 1986
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., U.S. cert.
  • State v. Picchini 463 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jackson 460 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. McKeel 443 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Guajardo 428 So. 2d 468 La. 1983
    This section permits us to determine both whether the range of sentences authorized by a criminal statute is excessive, and whether the sentence of the particular offender is excessive, though within the statutorily prescribed range.
  • State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
  • State v. Johnson 406 So. 2d 569 La. 1981
  • State v. Kelly 375 So. 2d 1344 La. 1979
    This Court has held that the unconstitutionality of a statute upon which a prosecution is based is a patent error, but it cannot be said that the prosecution here was so based simply because a single jury instruction was based *1350 upon an interpretation of the first and second degree murder statutes which we have held to be unconstitutional.
  • State v. Wrestle, Inc. 360 So. 2d 831 La. 1978
  • State v. Jones 347 So. 2d 200 La. 1977
    In State v. Stewart, La., (1976), we held that this Court could properly review the constitutionality of a statute though the defendant had not complied with the assignment of error procedure, including the making of a timely objection.
  • State v. Jolla 337 So. 2d 197 La. 1976
    State v. Maduell, La., (1976); State v. Williams, La., (1976); State v. Stewart, La., (1976); State v. Alexander, La., (1976).
  • State v. McClinton 329 So. 2d 676 La. 1976
    (decided January 19, 1976); State v. Howard, 262 La.
  • State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 819 La. 1976
    That earlier conviction is also before this Court and is the subject of our companion opinion, (La.