Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jenkins, 340 So. 2d 157.

90 citing documents.

Distinguished State v. Brock 210 So. 3d 276 La. 2017
1 Considering the totality of the circumstances, including the illegality of the Prescription Monitoring Program report’s provenance, defendant’s pharmacy records were obtained “by exploitation of the illegality,” and not by “means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Dixon 974 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
the defendants, Jenkins, Waters, and Paschal, fatally shot a teller at Peoples Bank & Trust Company of Minden during an armed robbery.
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
State v. McCoy 817 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
P. art. 703(A) known as the “attenuation doctrine,” where the connection between the initial unconstitutional detention and the discovered evidence have “become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint.” State v. Hill, 97-2551 (La.11/6/98)
State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
State v. Hill 725 So. 2d 1282 La. 1998
See also United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 661 (5th Cir.1976) ("the doctrine of attenuation permits the introduction of evidence which bears only a very indirect relation to the illegal search.").
State v. Burmaster 710 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Williams 703 So. 2d 636 La. 1997
1976); and counsel otherwise failed to show specifically that joint trial would prejudice the defendant and require separate trials in the interest of justice.
State v. Tate 657 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. King 573 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Sneed 571 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Rodriguez 554 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Greene 542 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Rios 528 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Finley 520 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Neidlinger 498 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
at 1626, n. 10 , as an alternative to a severed trial.
State v. Magee 487 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Prudholm 446 So. 2d 729 La. 1984
State v. Brown 428 So. 2d 438 La. 1983
770(2)), it could have been excised or deleted () without excluding the entire relevant document.
State v. Jackson 424 So. 2d 997 La. 1982
State v. Tonubbee 420 So. 2d 126 La. 1982
State v. Roubique 421 So. 2d 859 La. 1982
Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338, 341 , 60 S.Ct.
State v. McCabe 420 So. 2d 955 La. 1982
1978) this Court has held that a defendant must show both that the testimony of out of state witnesses would be material and that the Trial Judge abused his discretion in denying defendant's motion requesting them.
State v. Williams 416 So. 2d 914 La. 1982
State v. Jones 412 So. 2d 1051 La. 1982
State v. Mitchell 412 So. 2d 1042 La. 1982
State v. Lavigne 412 So. 2d 993 La. 1982
State v. Rodrigue 409 So. 2d 556 La. 1982
State v. Manuel 408 So. 2d 1235 La. 1982
1978); State v. Thibodeaux, supra .
State v. Jones 408 So. 2d 1285 La. 1982
State v. Whitt 404 So. 2d 254 La. 1981
we held that the trial judge's determination of whether to grant or deny severance rests in his sound discretion, and absent a showing of clear abuse, such a ruling will not be reversed by this court.
State v. Davis 399 So. 2d 1168 La. 1981
State v. Scott 389 So. 2d 1285 La. 1980
State v. Bertrand 381 So. 2d 489 La. 1980
State v. Gordy 380 So. 2d 1347 La. 1980
State v. Patton 374 So. 2d 1211 La. 1979
307, 312 (1939); State v. Holmes, supra, 354 So.2d at 1285, 1286 (Dennis, Tate, JJ.
State v. Hogan 372 So. 2d 1211 La. 1979
State v. Collins 370 So. 2d 533 La. 1979
[1] this Court held that the appropriate sentence to be imposed upon a valid conviction for first degree murder is the most severe penalty established by the legislature for criminal homicide at the time of the offense which could be presumed to be constitutional in the light of Roberts v. Louisiana, supra .
State v. McGraw 366 So. 2d 1278 La. 1979
State v. Koncir 367 So. 2d 365 La. 1979
407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1971)
State v. Adams 367 So. 2d 8 La. 1978
3001 , 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976)
State v. Turner 365 So. 2d 1352 La. 1978
State v. Thibodeaux, supra
State v. Barnes 365 So. 2d 1282 La. 1978
State v. Jenkins, La., (1976); U. S. v. Joseph, 533 F.2d 282 (5th Cir. 1976), cert.
State v. Davis 359 So. 2d 986 La. 1978
407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1971)
State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
412 , 54 L.Ed.2d 287 (1977)
State v. Forrest 356 So. 2d 945 La. 1978