Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Morris, 328 So. 2d 65.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Terry Lemaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
10/20/94), (per curiam); overruled by State v. Gleason, 21-1788 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Kenneth James Gleason (Parish of East Baton Rouge) Court Of Appeal Reversed; Appeal Dismissed; … La. 2022
The co urt of appeal – adhering to this Court’s (La.
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Lambert La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Sargent La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
10/20/94), and State v. Burton, 46,552 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Gene McLain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
10/20/94), and State v. Burton, 46,552 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Reado, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Harvey, 94-343, p. 1 (La.10/20/94), ( ); State v. Burton, 46,552, p. 1 (La.App.
State v. Reado 139 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Harvey, 94-343, p. 1 (La.10/20/94), ( , 566 (La.1978); ); State v. Burton, 46,552, p. 1 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. James Bowden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/20/94), ( ); State v. Burton, 46,552, p. 1 (La.App.
State v. Bowden 106 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Harvey, 94-343, p. 1 (La.10/20/94), ( , 566 (La.1978); ); State v. Burton, 46,552, p. 1 (La.App.
State v. Burton 74 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1983), the judgment of conviction is vacated and all proceedings in this prosecution are abated from their inception.
State v. Malone 25 So. 3d 113 La. 2009
* |, relative to whether the satisfaction of a misdemeanor sentence by payment of the fine imposed renders subsequent appellate review of the conviction moot.
State v. Recile 5 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1983) (per curiam); (La.
State v. Caldwell 673 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Harvey 644 So. 2d 371 La. 1994
State v. Laborde 543 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Stovall 541 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Lafitte 476 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
In a similar situation, stated that “the surviving family has an interest in preserving, unstained, the memory of the deceased defendant or his reputation.” The court went *403 on to state that this interest is of such importance as to require that the conviction be vacated and all proceedings in the prosecution against defendant
State v. Granger 463 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. DeHart 445 So. 2d 419 La. 1984
State v. Beasley 438 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Thom 438 So. 2d 208 La. 1983
State v. Clayton 427 So. 2d 827 La. 1983
State v. Broadnax 421 So. 2d 238 La. 1982
State v. Clayton and Isom, - So.2d - (La.1982), Nos. 82-KA-0730, 81-KA-1514
State v. Hennigan 404 So. 2d 222 La. 1981
State v. McClow 395 So. 2d 757 La. 1981
State v. Hamilton 370 So. 2d 874 La. 1979
State v. Anderson 364 So. 2d 566 La. 1978
State v. Fagot 361 So. 2d 226 La. 1978
State v. Luck 353 So. 2d 225 La. 1977
State v. Ferina 351 So. 2d 1200 La. 1977