DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boleyn, 328 So. 2d 95.

22 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Michael R. Suydam, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    There was no evidence of involuntary intoxication in this matter, and “voluntary intoxication can be considered as a defense only in cases where specific intent is a necessary element of the crime.”
  • State of Louisiana Versus Brian Clarke La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    “Voluntary intoxication can be considered as a defense only in cases where specific intent is a necessary element of the crime.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy Aaron Dangerfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    “[V]oluntary intoxication can be considered as a defense only in cases where specific intent is a necessary element of the crime.”
  • State v. Dangerfield 214 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    “[V]oluntary intoxication can be considered as a defense only in cases where, specific intent is a necessary element of the crime.”
  • State v. Magee 916 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    App. 5 Cir. 11/14/01), , writ denied, 01-3326 (La.1/10/03), ( State v. Leroux, 94-133 (La.App.
  • State v. Garner 890 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Taylor 802 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Leroux, 94-133, p. 8 (La.App.
  • State v. Bush 733 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    the court recognized an extremely limited defense of justification for escape.
  • State v. Recard 704 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Sheppard 646 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Sheppard 618 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Slaid 614 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    After hearing argument of counsel, the trial court agreed that the defense of justification could not be presented to the jury because defendant failed to establish by a (La.
  • State v. Hurst 606 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. McDaniel 515 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Schell 492 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Reed 448 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Rives 407 So. 2d 1195 La. 1981
  • State v. Baldwin 388 So. 2d 679 La. 1980
    The court's observation that counsel could not introduce this type of testimony without laying a
  • State v. Jacobs 371 So. 2d 801 La. 1979
  • State v. Liggett 363 So. 2d 1184 La. 1978
  • State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
    State v. Scott, La., (1977); State v. Boleyn, La., (1976).
  • State v. Scott 344 So. 2d 1002 La. 1977