Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Overton, 337 So. 2d 1058.

43 citing documents.

State v. Cespedes 241 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jacito Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
The fifth circuit stated: on rehearing, the Supreme Court discussed whether LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Frank 159 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The fifth circuit stated: on rehearing, the Supreme Court discussed whether LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Lathan 953 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Owens, 30,903 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo Tennors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Tennors 923 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Brooks 838 So. 2d 725 La. 2003
State v. Sellers 818 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Williams 738 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
the supreme court, on rehearing, rejected a challenge similar to that made by this defendant, after finding no prejudice to the defendant in that case.
State v. Medious 722 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
on rehearing, the Supreme Court discussed whether LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
State v. Chapman 683 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Vale 650 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
State v. Harrison 628 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Coates 622 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Jones 620 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Thurman 574 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
in which the Court found that a delay of fourteen days, caused by the preferential retrial of a mistrial, the position of the case on the docket, and hearings on defense motions, was not excessive.
State v. White 543 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
and authorities cited therein.
State v. Scott 537 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Briggs 526 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Martin 509 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 509 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Burge 498 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Hobdy 494 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Benton 482 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
They are nothing more than vague references to his neighborhood and previous instances which indicated the particular address to be defendant’ in which the court held that a mistrial was properly denied when a police officer made similar statements even though no admonition to disregard them was given the jury.
State v. Johnston 480 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Gibson 459 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Delahoussaye 443 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Taylor 430 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Furthermore, where the court held that a mistrial was not warranted even though there, as in our case, no admonition was given.
State v. Lodrige 414 So. 2d 759 La. 1982
State v. St. Amant 413 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
State v. Tauzier 397 So. 2d 494 La. 1981
State v. Adams 394 So. 2d 1204 La. 1981
State v. McMahon 391 So. 2d 1120 La. 1980
State v. Delore 381 So. 2d 455 La. 1980
State v. Martin 376 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
State v. Williams 375 So. 2d 364 La. 1979
State v. Heads 370 So. 2d 564 La. 1979
State v. Sepulvado 359 So. 2d 137 La. 1978
State v. Russell 352 So. 2d 1289 La. 1977
State v. Schwander 345 So. 2d 1173 La. 1977