DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

  • State v. Wilson 968 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Williams 965 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    The defendant entered a plea of guilty to first degree murder
  • State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Although defendant pleaded guilty to both of these offenses in Docket No. 42,188-KA
  • State v. Simmons 968 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Thereafter, defendant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and pled guilty as charged
  • State v. Triplet 962 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    He pled guilty as charged but reserved his right to appeal a
  • State v. Thigpen 963 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Thigpen then entered an agreement with the state whereby he pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and possession of a *480 firearm by a convicted felon
  • State v. Smith 960 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Guillory 957 So. 2d 132 La. 2007
    reserving his right to appeal on the issue of whether the police lawfully seized the evidence against him.
  • State v. Walton 957 So. 2d 133 La. 2007
    reserving his right to appeal on the issue of whether the police lawfully seized the evidence against him.
  • State v. LONZO 960 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    On that same date, defendant withdrew her plea of guilty plea and pled guilty as charged
  • State v. MacK 954 So. 2d 767 La. 2007
    The decision of the court of appeal is reversed and this case is remanded for purposes of providing defendant with his appeal of the trial court's adverse ruling on his motion to suppress
  • State v. Nicholas 958 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Smith 954 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Jerred 953 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Williams 952 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Defendant, Dejoshua Williams, appeals his conviction for aggravated flight from an officer arising from a
  • State v. Lauff 953 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) reserving her right to appeal all pretrial motions, including the motion to quash.
  • State v. Mendenhall 948 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Taylor, 30,531 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), .
  • State v. Bozeman 951 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) and, he reserved his right to appeal the trial court's pre-trial ruling.
  • State v. Anderson 949 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    After the trial court heard and denied the defendant's motion to suppress the evidence, the defendant pleaded guilty as charged
  • State v. Floyd 946 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970)
  • State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Mr. Roberts, however, reserved his right under *168 1 to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence against him.
  • State v. Vance 948 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Following the denial of his motion to suppress, the Defendant withdrew his not guilty plea on both counts, and entered a
  • State of Louisiana v. Justin D. Savoie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Bell 947 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    The court denied both motions, and Bell then entered a (La.
  • State v. Savoie 944 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Smith 947 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    NOTES [1] , (La.1976) allows a defendant to plead guilty and reserve appellate review of the denial of his Motion to Suppress.
  • State v. Dillon 947 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    On March 30, 2006, defendant withdrew his former plea and entered a guilty plea to third-offense driving while intoxicated, (La.
  • State v. Gomez 947 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    On April 4, 2005, the defendant pled guilty to both counts
  • State v. Manuel 946 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    The plea as to the first count included a
  • State v. Kelly 946 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Marley 945 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. CHATTERSON 942 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    The defendant then entered a (La.
  • State v. Chauvin 945 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    On January 13, 2005, the defendant withdrew his not guilty plea, and entered a reserving his right to a review of the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress.
  • State v. Leonard 945 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Dodson 942 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Yates 940 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Stephan, 38,612 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Fay v. Perez, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Defendant reserved his right to appeal the issue of payment of restitution to the victims’ insurance companies, should that condition be made part of his sentence.
  • State v. Perez 939 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Defendant reserved his right to appeal the issue of payment of restitution to the victims' insurance companies, should that condition be made part of his sentence.
  • State v. Mourra 940 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    After the bill of information was amended to the reduced charge, reserving his right to appeal the trial court's denial of the motion to quash.
  • State v. Kelley 934 So. 2d 51 La. 2006
  • State v. Mendenhall 930 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court decided for the first time that a defendant could enter a guilty plea and reserve his right to appellate review of alleged non-jurisdictional errors; however, absent a prejudicial error patent on the face of the record, a defendant who pleads guilty waives his right to obtain app
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The court granted the writ, holding that an appeal was the appropriate vehicle to seek review following a
  • State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The court granted the writ, holding that an appeal was the appropriate vehicle to seek review following a guilty plea and the reservation of the right to appeal in accordance with *289
  • State v. Clay 930 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Wynne 926 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Stephan, 38,612 (La.App.2d Cir.08/18/04), .
  • State v. Johnson 926 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    On September 9, 2005, defendant pled guilty
  • State v. Culverhouse 926 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Phillips 934 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant pled guilty to count III, as amended
  • State v. Atkins 926 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    reserving his right to appeal the trial court's denial of his Motion to Suppress Evidence.
  • State v. Stanfield 925 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006