Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

  • State v. McCoil 924 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Landry, 02-1242 (La.App.
  • State v. Reed 924 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Defendant then advised |3the court that he wished to waive his rights and plead guilty as charged, 1 reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s
  • State v. Burciaga 924 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    He withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty as charged
  • State v. Kujawa 929 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Doussan 924 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    On May 26, 2004, after being advised of his Boykin rights, the Defendant again pled guilty, (La.
  • State v. Williams 924 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Slaydon 921 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    NOTES [1] an accused may enter a guilty plea but reserve his right to appellate review of pre-plea assignments of error.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Slaydon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The trial court suspended the thirty- 1 an accused may enter a guilty plea but reserve his right to appellate review of pre-plea assignments of error.
  • State v. Broadway 920 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    40:966 A. After the district court denied his motion to suppress certain physical evidence and his confession, he pled guilty to attempted cultivation of marijuana
  • State v. Handy 925 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Handy elected to plead guilty to the reduced charge, (La.
  • State v. Pulliam 920 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    On February 3, 2005, the Defendant pled guilty to the offense as charged
  • State of Louisiana v. David James Pulliam La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    On February 3, 2005, the Defendant pled guilty to the offense as charged
  • State v. Breaux 920 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Following this denial, defendant, on February 22, 2005, reserving his right to appeal the trial court's denial of his motion to quash.
  • State v. Jackson 919 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    A defendant's failure to specify which pre-trial rulings he desires to reserve for appeal as part of a may limit the scope of appellate review but should not preclude review altogether.
  • State v. Stephens 917 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    NOTES [1] Stephens reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the seized methamphetamine.
  • State v. Bessie 917 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    On September 22, 2003, defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty and tendered a plea of guilty
  • State v. Lagarde 917 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    (1976) after the trial court denied his Motion to Suppress Evidence.
  • State v. Chestnut 917 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    14:98, driving while intoxicated, third offense, and pleaded guilty as charged on November 10, 2004, specifically reserving his rights to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash
  • State of Louisiana v. John Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Joseph 916 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Ledford 914 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    After the trial court denied the defendant's motion to suppress, the defendant entered a plea of guilty
  • State v. Sims 914 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    The trial court erred denying (sic) the Motion to Suppress the evidence, .
  • State v. Caston 912 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    GASKINS, J. The defendant, Jesse James Caston, pled guilty to second degree murder
  • State v. Malone 912 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    He pled guilty as charged but reserved his right to appeal a
  • State v. Watson 911 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    After the trial court denied the defendant's motion to quash the bill of information, the defendant entered a plea of guilty
  • State v. Dixon 911 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Thereafter, Dixon entered a guilty plea to possession of a Schedule II CDS, cocaine, with intent to distribute, pursuant to *376 preserving his right to appeal the denial of the Motion to Suppress while still denying his factual guilt.
  • State v. Demming 911 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    CARAWAY, J. The defendant, Antonio Dejuan Demming, pled guilty to two counts of armed robbery and one count of first degree robbery
  • State v. Garrison 911 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Louis 910 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Thereafter, defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty and pled guilty to possession of cocaine
  • State v. Theard 904 So. 2d 681 La. 2005
    The courts below erred by considering the merits of the defendant’s Crosby reservation, in an out-of-time appeal granted years after finality of the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
  • State v. Jacobs 904 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    thereby reserving his appeal rights.
  • State v. Hudnall 903 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    BROWN, C.J. Defendant, Michael Todd Hudnall, pled guilty to a reduced charge of attempted possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, (La.
  • State v. Strahan 916 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    The defendant initially entered a plea of not guilty; however, following the denial of his motion to suppress, the defendant entered a guilty *210
  • State v. Cambre 902 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Following this ruling, on August 24, 2004, the Defendant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and again pled guilty as charged after being advised of his constitutional rights, to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.
  • State v. Stewart 902 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Sellers 902 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    however, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [Ejven an un [siejqualified plea of guilty does not preclude review of what are regarded as ‘jurisdictional’ defects — ■ those which, even conceding the accused’s factual guilt, do not permit his conviction of the offense charged.
  • State v. Williams 900 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    _|_iMOORE, J. Keary, Williams pled guilty to one count of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, reserving his right to contest the ruling on a
  • State v. Hollimon 900 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Thereafter, defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty and pled guilty to possession of cocaine
  • State v. Francois 900 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Jones 907 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Thereafter, he entered a reserving the right to challenge being charged with a fifth offense operating a vehicle while intoxicated under bill of information No. 430,061 and reserving the right to challenge the trial court’s imposition of the sentence under bill of information No. 430,061 to run consecutive with the sentence under b
  • State v. Jones 907 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Thereafter, he entered a reserving the right to challenge being charged with a fifth offense operating a vehicle while intoxicated under bill of information No. 430,061 and reserving the *141 right to challenge the trial court’s imposition of the sentence under bill of information No. 4430,061 to run consecutive with the sentence u
  • State v. Kenner 900 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    in which a defendant preserves pretrial errors for review, here the state argues that Mr. Kenner failed to qualify his plea as such.
  • State v. Cole 900 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Had the trial court denied any of Defendant's suppression motions
  • State v. Pugh 906 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Busby 893 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In pleading guilty, the defendant reserved his right, to appeal the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress the results of a chemical test for intoxication performed on a blood sample taken at Lafayette General Medical Center (Lafayette General) in Lafayette, Louisiana, on the night of the accident.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tommy Cloud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    has stated that a guilty plea is involuntary if it is based upon an impossible plea agreement.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ben Busby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In pleading guilty, the defendant reserved his right, to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the results of a chemical test for intoxication performed on a blood sample taken at Lafayette General Medical Center (Lafayette General) in Lafayette, Louisiana, on the night of the accident.
  • State v. Cloud 893 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    has stated that a guilty plea is involuntary if it is based upon an impossible plea agreement.
  • State v. Saulsby 892 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Defendant reserved his right, to appeal the trial court's denial of his suppression motion.
  • State v. Leonard 892 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Appellate counsel notes that, when he entered his guilty pleas