DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

  • State v. Chaisson 457 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. White 458 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    On February 14, 1984, defendant retracted his former pleas of not guilty to both offenses, pled guilty to the attempted aggravated rape charge and pled guilty to forcible rape 2 on the aggravated rape charge specifically reserving his right to appeal the court’s
  • State v. Schreiber 457 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    On October 31, 1983, the defendants withdrew their former plea of not guilty and pled guilty to both charges, (1976).
  • Distinguished State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wilson 457 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Defendant pled guilty, reserving his right, (La.
  • State v. Harris 454 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Tate 454 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Michael 454 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “[i]t is well settled that entry of an unqualified plea of guilty waives all non-jurisdictional defects occurring prior thereto, and precludes review thereof either by appeal, or where appeal is unavailable by supervisory review.” [emphasis added] an exception was made to the general rule.
  • State v. Landry 454 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    In tendering his plea, to appeal the trial court's ruling on the motion to suppress, which ruling is now the subject of this appeal.
  • State v. Bethley 452 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Fleniken 451 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ealy 451 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Davis 452 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    On October 27, 1983, the defendant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty as charged, to appeal the trial court's ruling on his motion to suppress.
  • State v. Jones 451 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    On March 16, 1983, following the denial of various motions, including motions to suppress his confession and identification, appellant pled guilty as charged to all three counts
  • State v. Furino 451 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Peterson 451 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    14:65) the adverse ruling on his motion to suppress (Assignment No. 1).
  • State v. Blanchard 450 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 3 Defendant alleges the trial judge erred in denying defendant’s motion for disclosure of the confidential informant’s identity
  • State v. Cover 450 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    defendant has appealed the pretrial denial of his motion to suppress evidence.
  • State v. Rush 450 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    reserving his right to appeal the ruling on the motion to suppress.
  • State v. Bearden 449 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Kleinpeter 449 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Talbert 449 So. 2d 446 La. 1984
    Talbert then pleaded guilty
  • State v. Manso 449 So. 2d 480 La. 1984
  • State v. Davis 449 So. 2d 466 La. 1984
    When defendant pleaded guilty
  • State v. Wilms 449 So. 2d 442 La. 1984
    Wilms then pleaded guilty
  • State v. Oliver 448 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    The defendant entered a plea of guilty to this charge reserving his right to seek appellate review of the trial court's denial of his Motion to Suppress
  • State v. Waterloo 447 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    to appeal the trial court’s denial of motions to suppress and reserving his right to with *563 draw the guilty plea if successful on appeal.
  • State v. Smith 447 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Farber 446 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Morace 446 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Huston 445 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    NOTES [1] allows the entering of a plea of guilty and the reservation of the right to appeal the overruling of a motion to suppress.
  • State v. Barousse 442 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Guidry 442 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Singletary 442 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Granier 442 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Dunn 442 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Defendant, to seek review of the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress.
  • State v. Ditcharo 441 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    reserving his right to this appeal following the trial judge’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant.
  • Overruled State v. Stroud 438 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Thereafter, on June 9th, each defendant entered a plea of guilty to the crime charged
  • State v. Spurgeon 437 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Connella 436 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Stewart 434 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Hall 434 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. St. Hill 433 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Wiggins 432 So. 2d 234 La. 1983
  • State v. Mann 431 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    allows such an appeal of a guilty plea where the defendant expressly retains his right to seek appellate review of pre-plea rulings which defendant urges are reversibly erroneous.
  • State v. Walker 430 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Zamora 430 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    He pleaded guilty, reserving his right to appeal the court’s adverse ruling on his motion to suppress and motion to disclose the identity of the confidential informer, (La.
  • State v. Phipps 429 So. 2d 445 La. 1983
  • State v. Majors 430 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Reserving his right to appeal from an adverse ruling on a motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a (La.