Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

  • State v. Bruno 427 So. 2d 1174 La. 1983
  • State v. Singletary 428 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Rayes 424 So. 2d 260 La. 1982
  • State v. Patterson 422 So. 2d 1131 La. 1982
  • State v. Roubique 421 So. 2d 859 La. 1982
  • State v. Moore 420 So. 2d 1099 La. 1982
    this Court held that where a defendant, at the time of entering a guilty plea, expressly stipulates that he does not waive his right to the review of a non-jurisdictional pre-plea ruling, this Court will review that ruling.
  • State v. Lewis 421 So. 2d 227 La. 1982
    and now asserts one assignment of error: that his previous convictions for DWI should not be used to enhance the penalty for the present conviction because the minutes do not show that he was properly Boykin ized when he pleaded guilty to the prior offenses.
  • State v. Shea 421 So. 2d 200 La. 1982
  • State v. Williams 421 So. 2d 874 La. 1982
  • State v. Watson 416 So. 2d 919 La. 1982
  • State v. Schaeffer 414 So. 2d 730 La. 1982
  • State v. Thibodeaux 414 So. 2d 366 La. 1982
  • State v. Brannon 414 So. 2d 335 La. 1982
  • State v. Hathaway 411 So. 2d 1074 La. 1982
  • State v. Conley 411 So. 2d 448 La. 1982
  • State v. Coleman 412 So. 2d 532 La. 1982
  • State v. Fontenot 410 So. 2d 1112 La. 1982
  • State v. Crain 409 So. 2d 603 La. 1982
  • State v. Davis 409 So. 2d 268 La. 1982
  • State v. Moore 408 So. 2d 1220 La. 1982
    Defendant, with the court's approval, conditioned his guilty plea on his right to appeal to this Court, the issue of whether the court minutes showing his two prior guilty pleas to charges of violation of La.R.S.
  • State v. Morris 411 So. 2d 45 La. 1982
    Defendant’s plea to the current DWI 3 charge, entered with a Crosby [State v. Crosby, La., ] reservation, is set aside and the case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
  • State v. Boowell 406 So. 2d 213 La. 1981
  • State v. Bourgeois 406 So. 2d 550 La. 1981
  • State v. Harris 406 So. 2d 128 La. 1981
  • State v. McKinney 406 So. 2d 160 La. 1981
    rehearing denied October 15, 1976; rehearing denied January 21, 1977.
  • State v. Jones 404 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
    The defendant, with the approval of the state and trial judge, on the issue of whether the court minutes showing his two prior guilty pleas to charges of violation of La.R.S.
  • State v. Hill 404 So. 2d 966 La. 1981
  • State v. Morstein 404 So. 2d 916 La. 1981
  • State v. Lehnen 403 So. 2d 683 La. 1981
  • State v. Bowick 403 So. 2d 673 La. 1981
    defendant must explicitly reserve his right to appeal adverse pretrial rulings.
  • State v. Keller 403 So. 2d 693 La. 1981
  • State v. Givens 403 So. 2d 65 La. 1981
  • State v. Petterway 403 So. 2d 1157 La. 1981
  • State v. Klar 400 So. 2d 610 La. 1981
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Malik 404 So. 2d 883 La. 1981
  • State v. Wiggins 399 So. 2d 206 La. 1981
    [1] This procedure of entering a (La.
  • State v. Mena 399 So. 2d 149 La. 1981
  • State v. Leonard 394 So. 2d 1214 La. 1981
    495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)
  • State v. Roberds 393 So. 2d 715 La. 1981
  • State v. Landry 393 So. 2d 713 La. 1981
  • State v. McPhate 393 So. 2d 718 La. 1981
    which set forth the right to appeal certain pre-trial rulings after a plea of guilty was entered, sought to limit such appeals to the type of error which represents a violation of a constitutional or statutory right which, for reasons beyond guilt or innocence, would mandate a reversal of a conviction resul
  • Overruled State v. Kaercher 394 So. 2d 1175 La. 1980
    After a motion to suppress evidence was overruled, defendants entered a conditional plea of guilty, and were each sentenced to ten years at hard labor.
  • State v. Salazar 389 So. 2d 1295 La. 1980
  • State v. Baker 389 So. 2d 1289 La. 1980
  • State v. McCoy 395 So. 2d 319 La. 1980
    [7] This case exemplifies a problem of which the court was aware when, the court recognized the discretion of the trial court to accept a qualified guilty plea reserving the right to seek review of specified pre-plea rulings of the trial court.
  • State v. Packard 389 So. 2d 56 La. 1980
  • State v. Bourgeois 388 So. 2d 359 La. 1980
  • State v. Lewis 385 So. 2d 226 La. 1980
    to seek review of the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress.
  • State v. Denton 387 So. 2d 578 La. 1980
  • State v. Edsall 385 So. 2d 207 La. 1980