Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

State v. Vance 225 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Richter 243 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Defendant's guilty plea was made pursuant to State v. Crosby , (La.
State ex rel. Stewart v. State 222 So. 3d 1268 La. 2017
State v. Johnson 224 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Davis 224 So. 3d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Further, as there were no rulings, (La.
State v. Rodriguez 224 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Rodriguez 224 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Watts 223 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
On September 22, 2016, the defendant entered a (La.
State v. Joseph 223 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. Slaughter v. State 220 So. 3d 723 La. 2017
State v. Payne 220 So. 3d 882 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
State v. Payne 220 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Anderson 222 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Jamison 222 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Counsel notes that defendant pled guilty pursuant to a (La.
State ex rel. Scramuzza v. State 218 So. 3d 91 La. 2017
State ex rel. Sias v. State 217 So. 3d 340 La. 2017
State v. Meadows 219 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
There were no other pre-trial motions filed, ruled upon, (La.
State v. Camp 215 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Camp 215 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Shelby 215 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Lorrie A. Anderson AKA Lorrie Ann Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
However, she does contend the evidence against her was weak and her counsel was ill-prepared and “should never have forfeited her rights to an appeal.” She argues her counsel should have, “[a]t the very least,” entered a which would have allowed her to appeal pre-trial rulings.
State v. Anderson 214 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
However, she does contend the evidence against her was weak and her counsel was ill-prepared and “should never have forfeited her rights to an appeal.” She argues her counsel should have, “[a]t the very least,” entered a which would have allowed her to appeal pre-trial rulings.
State ex rel. Guardado v. State 211 So. 3d 1157 La. 2017
State v. Ables 213 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Martin 210 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Duncan 213 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Also, no rulings were ^ (La.
State v. Martin 213 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Further, no rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. *1260 Crosby, (La.
State v. Engle 213 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Capers 211 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Following the denial of his pro se motions, Capers expressed a (La.
State ex rel. Adams v. State 207 So. 3d 1040 La. 2016
State ex rel. Kenny v. State 207 So. 3d 1053 La. 2016
State v. Norris 207 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Ferrera 208 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The record reflects defendant did not preserve these rulings, or any other rulings, (La.
State of Louisiana v. James J. Flournoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Smith 206 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Stokes 205 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Defendant, however, (La.
State v. Harris 205 So. 3d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Joseph 205 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Flournoy 209 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Shiell 204 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
On April 4, 2016, Defendant withdrew his not guilty plea • (La.
State ex rel. Englade v. State 206 So. 3d 189 La. 2016
State in the Interest of J.J.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
160 (1970), the Juvenile entered an admission to simple rape and one count of indecent behavior with a juvenile under the age of thirteen.
State ex rel. J.J.M. 207 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), (La.
State v. Morin 203 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The State further responds that defendant cannot challenge the trial judge’s denial of his “Motion for Suspended Sentence and Probation Despite a Mandatory Minimum Sentence” (La.
State v. Morin 203 So. 3d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The State further responds that defendant cannot challenge the trial judge’s denial of his “Motion for Suspended Sentence and Probation Despite a Mandatory Minimum Sentence” .
State v. Lodge 195 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
15:542 does not prohibit this Court from addressing double jeopardy.
State ex rel. Gros v. State 191 So. 3d 576 La. 2016
State v. Manning 196 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
However, Manning’s guilty plea was entered with a
State v. Durall 192 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Durall 192 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016