Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

State v. Cooper 260 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Jefferson 261 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), (La.
State v. Williams 254 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
He states that during the guilty plea proceeding, he pleaded guilty because it was in his "best interest" in accordance with the language in State v. Crosby , (La.
State ex rel. Hickman v. State 251 So. 3d 398 La. 2018
State v. Smith 253 So. 3d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Here, defendant entered unqualified guilty pleas, and therefore, all non-jurisdictional defects have been waived and no rulings were preserved for appeal under State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Miller 254 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Willis 253 So. 3d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Nonetheless, Willis asserts he entered a guilty plea pursuant to State v. Crosby , (La.
State ex rel. Jones v. State 249 So. 3d 823 La. 2018
1981) ; State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
State v. Green 252 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Finally, no rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Rivas 251 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Cowans 251 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Following the denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence and statements, 1 he entered into the guilty plea on April 27, 2017, under the provisions of State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Salinas 251 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Following the denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence and statements, he entered into the guilty plea on May 18, 2017, under the provisions of State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Flugence 250 So. 3d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
There were no pre-trial rulings preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Nelson 247 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
art. 881.1, advising the trial court that he had intended to enter his plea under State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Woods 248 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Nelson 248 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
art. 881.1, advising the trial court that he had intended to enter his plea under State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Lampton 249 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Hudson 249 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appellate review under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Lampton 249 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State ex rel. R.W. 246 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Espinoza 246 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Further, no rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Vaughn 248 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Thus, the record does not contain any pre-trial rulings that could have been preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Nelson Zeno AKA Nelson Joseph Zeno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Curry 240 So. 3d 909 La. 2018
See State v. Crosby , , 588 (La.
State v. Bradham 246 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Kruebbe 244 So. 3d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
1602 , 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973) ); State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
State v. Garcie 242 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Having pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement wherein defendant reserved his appellate right under State v. Crosby , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Leger, Jr. AKA Wilbert Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Murray 242 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Thereafter, defendant withdrew his not guilty pleas and pleaded guilty as charged under State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Gumms 243 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Further, as there were no rulings, none were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State ex rel. Wilkerson v. State 236 So. 3d 544 La. 2018
State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
Lightfoot v. Keith 236 So. 3d 563 La. 2018
State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
State v. Brown 239 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
On April 6, 2016, defendant withdrew his former pleas of not guilty and entered pleas of guilty as charged on all counts of both bills of information, reserving his right to appeal adverse pre-trial rulings under State v. Crosby , (La.
State ex rel. Payton v. State 235 So. 3d 1098 La. 2018
By pleading guilty unconditionally, he waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Debarge -Aka- Jeffery Scot Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
the State asserts that Defendant’s unqualified guilty plea waived any non-jurisdictional defects and precludes appellate review or review on post-conviction.
State v. Debarge 238 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Citing State v. Crosby , the State asserts that Defendant's unqualified guilty plea waived any non-jurisdictional defects and precludes appellate review or review on post-conviction.
State v. LeBlanc 244 So. 3d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Thereafter, LeBlanc entered into a "best interest" plea agreement with the state, pursuant to State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Kelly 237 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
She also concludes that defendant did not preserve his right to appeal the trial court's ruling regarding the motion to suppress pursuant to State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Heath 236 So. 3d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In particular, appellate counsel points out that defendant pled guilty and was sentenced pursuant to a counseled plea agreement, that defendant did not preserve any rulings for review under State v. Crosby , (La.
State v. Taylor 236 So. 3d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Marenco 236 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
The record does not reflect that any rulings were preserved for appellate review under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dustin R. McGowan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State 1 Information regarding the presence of methamphetamine in Defendant’s system and the residue in his vehicle was obtained from the sentencing transcript.
State v. McGowan 258 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See State v. Crosby , ; (La.App.
State ex rel. Rainey v. State 228 So. 3d 193 La. 2017
By pleading guilty unconditionally, he waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction, (La.
State ex rel. Banks v. State 228 So. 3d 195 La. 2017
By pleading guilty unconditionally, relator waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction, (La.
State v. Neff 228 So. 3d 200 La. 2017
State v. Carter 230 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Demetricius Marcelle Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Fontenelle 227 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Julien 225 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017