Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

  • State v. Carto 167 So. 3d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Britton 167 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Reed 167 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    and, thus, that ruling is not at issue in this appeal.
  • State v. Lloyd 161 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    In Simmons , the defendant entered a to possession of marijuana with intent to distribute.
  • State v. Schexnayder 167 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    On April 8, 2014, pursuant to a plea agreement that is set forth in this record, defendant pled guilty as charged to possession of alprazolam, 1 to appeal the trial judge’s denial of his motion to suppress.
  • State v. Long 154 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    14:30, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s
  • State v. Morton 167 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Chandler 167 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gaubert 167 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
  • State v. Richardson 155 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Accordingly, the state argues, he waived his right to appellate review of any non-jurisdictional defects.
  • State v. Robertson 168 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    CRAIN, J. | ¡¿Defendant, Dontrell Derrell Robertson, to charges of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and obstruction of justice.
  • State v. Oliver 165 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Monroe 152 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    a trial court has discretion to accept or reject a guilty plea conditioned upon reservation of appellate review of pre-plea assignments of non-jurisdictional error.
  • State v. Smith 152 So. 3d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Kerry M. Guinn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Guinn 159 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
  • State v. Earwood 164 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Maurice Addison Hawley 149 So. 3d 1211 La. 2014
    subject to the Confrontation Clause, and 2 This pleading is fully entitled: “Defendant’s Notice of Objection to all Hearsay, Including Hearsay contained in Certificates and Other Documents; Defendant’s Notice that he is not Waiving his Right to Confront and Cross Examine Witnesses and that he will Assert his Right to Confront and Cross Examine all Witnesses.” 3 (La.
  • State v. Powell 151 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Murphy 181 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Brown 184 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    On February 24, 2014, reserving Ishis right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash.
  • State of Louisiana v. Landell L. Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    The courts below erred by considering the merits of the defendant’s Crosby reservation, in an out-of-time appeal granted years after finality of the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
  • State v. Davis 159 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The courts below erred by considering the merits of the defendant’s Crosby reservation, in an out-of-time appeal granted years after finality of the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
  • State v. Williams 144 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    And Mr. Harris entered a
  • State v. Harris 140 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Following the denial of his motion to suppress, the defendant pled guilty to these charges
  • State v. Greenberry 141 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Beal 142 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    That same day, defendant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a 3 Thereafter, the trial judge sentenced defendant to six years and eight months at hard labor, with credit for time served.
  • State v. Rabito 140 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Hoppens 140 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Additionally, and the record reflects that defendant’s plea was not made pursuant to Crosby .
  • State v. Goff 140 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Spriggins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Spriggins 135 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gros 138 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State ex rel. J.H. 137 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    (“Finally, in our review of preplea rulings or conduct, we may vacate the plea and remand for a new trial if we are not able, in the light of the above principles, to make adequate review of the assignments presented to us.”); see also, e.g., State in the Interest of J.E.T., 09-67, p. 25 (La.App.
  • State v. Griffin 136 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Williams 135 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Appellate counsel notes that the defendant did not enter a therefore, he waived his right to a review of the ruling on the motion to suppress.
  • State v. Robinson 136 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Following this denial, defendant, on August 19, 2013
  • State v. Rosales 132 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
  • State v. Anderson 136 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    On May 21, 2013, Mr. Anderson entered a guilty plea and preserved his right [ ] to appeal the adverse ruling on the motion to suppress.
  • State v. Leblanc 137 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The trial court 1 denied the motion to suppress, and defendant withdrew his earlier plea and entered a new plea of guilty as charged
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Next, counsel notes that defendant’s so those rulings have not been preserved for review.
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Candebat 133 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gayden 133 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    _jjThe defendant, Jarrin R. Gayden, arguing that his conviction for possession of marijuana, second offense, in violation of La.Rev.Stat.
  • State v. Siggio 134 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Holmes 130 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Cooper, 43,809 (La.App.
  • State v. Ricks 131 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Counsel notes that no rulings have been reserved for appellate review, as defendant’s
  • State v. Boutte 131 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Appellate counsel notes that although a motion to suppress was heard and denied by the court
  • State v. Murphy 131 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    art. 912 B. A defendant whose motion to suppress is denied, however, has an adequate remedy on appeal in the event of a conviction either by assigning as error the district judge’s denial of his motion to suppress or by reserving appellate review of that [¡¡