Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

State v. Hill 131 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
^Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence, which resulted from a
State of Louisiana v. Thaddius Brock Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
However, he reserved his right to appeal the October 25, 2012
State v. Bergeron 127 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
However, he reserved his right to appeal the October 25, 2012
State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Yolanda Martinez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Defendant then entered a reserving the right to appeal the denial of the motion to quash.
State of Louisiana v. Pineda Yanez Osbaldo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Defendant then entered a reserving his right to appeal the denial of the motion to quash.
State of Louisiana v. Keren Mejia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Defendant then entered a reserving her right to appeal the denial of the motion to quash.
State v. Martinez 124 So. 3d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Defendant then entered a reserving the right to appeal the denial of the motion to quash.
State v. Osbaldo 124 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Defendant then entered a reserving his right to appeal the denial of the motion to quash.
State v. Mejia 125 So. 3d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Defendant then entered a reserving her right to appeal the denial of the motion to quash.
State v. Passow 136 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
CRAIN, J. | ;>The defendant, Jeremy John Passow, pled guilty to third-offense driving while intoxicated (DWI) and was sentenced to five-years imprisonment at hard labor.
State v. Jones 128 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Defendant thereafter withdrew his former not guilty pleas and, pled guilty as charged to resisting an officer in case number 12-109 and possession of marijuana, second offense, in case number 12-422.
State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Counsel further notes that defendant’s so those rulings have not been preserved for review.
State v. Harris 128 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Appellate counsel notes that there is no trial court ruling to challenge
State v. Johnson 128 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State ex rel. L.C. 126 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lyons 128 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
5 Although the trial court denied Defendant’s motions to suppress statement and evidence, Defendant did not preserve these rulings, or any other rulings
State v. Weber 128 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Furthermore, defendant’s and no rulings have been reserved for appellate review.
State v. Alberti 128 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
On September 17, 2012, defendant withdrew his not guilty pleas and pled guilty as charged
State v. Williams 128 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The State subsequently refiled the multiple offender bill of information, and on January 14, 2013, defendant stipulated to being a
State v. Gates 128 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
However, after this Court denied defendant’s writ application on the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Suppress Chemical/Breath Test Results, 1 reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.
State v. Adams 125 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Defendant then entered a plea of nolo conten-dere
State v. Barabin 124 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
After the trial court denied the defendant’s motions to suppress the evidence and statement, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his two motions.
State v. Aston 125 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
On that same date, Defendant withdrew his |snot guilty *1152 reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence.
State ex rel. D.F. 122 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The record contains a transcript of the sentencing of both Mr. Santos-Castro and "Sel-vin Torres Rodriguez,”
State v. Bruce 121 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunter 121 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Thereafter, defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a thereby reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Upon entering his guilty plea, Mr. Howard reserved his right to appellate review of the trial court judge’s
State v. Ellison 121 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Caliste 131 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Wilson 119 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Ramon L. Ellender La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
After the trial court denied his motion, the defendant changed his plea to guilty as charged, but in doing so, he reserved his right to appeal the trial court‟s
State v. Brown 119 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The State responds that defendant’s and that defendant therefore waived his appellate rights by entering unqualified guilty pleas.
State v. Thomas 116 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Harrell 120 So. 3d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) reserving his right to appeal the denials of his motions to suppress.
State v. Turner 118 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
| ^Defendant, Latour Turner, appeals the trial court’s
State v. Burton 116 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court defined jurisdictional defects as those which do not permit conviction of the charged offense, even conceding a defendant’s factual guilt.
State of Louisiana v. Alexis Sarrabea La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
LEGAL ANALYSIS Defendant entered a guilty plea preserving his right to seek review of specified issues2
State v. Sarrabea 157 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
LEGAL ANALYSIS Defendant entered a guilty plea preserving his right to seek review of specified issues 2
State v. Guillot 115 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Guillot withdrew his previous plea and pled guilty to all charges, as amended, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.
State v. Williams 112 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Lampton 110 So. 3d 557 La. 2013
State v. Rodriguez 112 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
At the sentencing hearing on 24 January 2012, Torres-Rodriguez withdrew his former guilty pleas and re-entered a reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s judgment |sdenying his motion to suppress evidence.
State v. Pete 112 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
reserving his right to appeal the court’s denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Ford 113 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lemonte 108 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Burks 108 So. 3d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Smith, 41,829 (La.App.2d Cir.4/4/07), .
State v. Williams 108 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
According to the Boykin transcript, (1976), preserving his right to seek review of any adverse pretrial ruling on appeal.