Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.

1686 citing documents.

State v. Foster 108 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Subsequently, on that same date, Foster was advised of and waived all his rights, |2
State v. King 109 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
On May 25, 2011, reserving his right to appeal the issue of his motions to suppress.
State v. Skinner 108 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
State v. Chelette 106 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Callahan 106 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Grayson 106 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
thereby reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash.
State ex rel. T.H. 106 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Williams 106 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Pierce 106 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. James D. Flemones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
at 705 ( State v. Gaspard, 01-1042 (La.App.
State v. Massey 106 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
in which the court established that a defendant could expressly preserve for review on appeal an adverse pretrial ruling by entering a qualified plea of guilty.
State v. Brumfield 104 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
On 25 May 2011, Brumfield pleaded guilty pursuant |4 and reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Bridges 104 So. 3d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Kinard 105 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
I ¡¿Defendant, Enoch Kinard, appeals the trial court’s
State v. McKenzie 105 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Davis 105 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Following that denial, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s ruling on his motion to quash.
State of Louisiana v. Rasheed Ali Sterling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
the supreme court created the rule that a defendant could reserve the right to contest pre-plea defects as a condition of the guilty plea.
State of Louisiana v. Larry Nix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Taylor 103 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
On November 14, 2011, defendant withdrew his prior not guilty plea and entered *573 a plea of guilty to first degree vehicular negligent injuring, to seek appellate review of the denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Hubbard 103 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Gibson 103 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Stovall 102 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
On April 20, 2011, and North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Miller 102 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Fifi 102 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Christensen 102 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Following this denial, reserving his right to appeal the trial judge’s denial of the motion to quash.
State v. Fifi 102 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash.
State of Louisiana v. Rudolph Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
incompetent to stand trial will lead to a reversal of his conviction and sentence, issues concerning the competence of a defendant to stand trial are jurisdictional errors that may be reviewed on appeal notwithstanding a defendant’s guilty plea or his failure to specifically allege the issue as an assignment of error at the time he enters a [State v.] Crosby [] plea.
State v. Maffett 105 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
in that his reservation of rights "was inarguably vague and nonspecific,” but in the interest of judicial economy addresses both assignments as though properly reserved.
State v. Meyers 100 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Andres 100 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Matthews 100 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
On August 5, 2011, the defendant appeared for a
State v. Dillon 101 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
Thereafter, on November 2, 2011, thereby reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Clement 101 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Dowdell 99 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The trial court denied the defendant’s motions to suppress the evidence and the statement, (1976).
State v. Harris 98 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
And Mr. Harris entered a
State v. Cure 93 So. 3d 1268 La. 2012
State v. Lampton 95 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
On that date, the defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty
State v. Waldrop 93 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Paul Lisotta, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. William David Defoor, III AKA William Defoor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Lisotta 91 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Fleming 95 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Burney 92 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
The guilty plea, reserved Burney's right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress the cocaine seized.
State v. Patin 95 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash.
State v. Howard 91 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
We note that when defendant pled guilty
State v. Burton 98 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
thereby reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress.
State v. Banks 95 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Thereafter, reserving his right to ^appeal the trial judge’s denial of his motions to sup *512 press.
State v. Thompson 93 So. 3d 553 La. 2012
| ^Thereafter, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s ruling on his motion to suppress.
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Eric Daigle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
As part of his plea bargain, Defendant received a two-year hard labor sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence; Defendant was credited for time served; Defendant was required to register as a sex offender, and Defendant reserved the right to contest the trial court‟s
State v. Daigle 93 So. 3d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
As part of his plea bargain, Defendant received a two-year hard labor sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence; Defendant was credited for time served; Defendant was required to register as a sex offender, and Defendant reserved the right to contest the trial court’s