Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boettcher, 338 So. 2d 1356.

25 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tyson Cornelison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. John Colby Manuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Manuel 247 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Bodley , ; State v. Boettcher
State of Louisiana v. Timothy H. Queen -Aka- Timothy Hugh Queen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Queen 237 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Bodley , ; State v. Boettcher
State v. Jordan 813 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Hodges 749 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Dupre, supra ; concurring opinion
State v. Sullivan 729 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Dupre, supra ; concurring opinion
State v. Wafer 719 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Mahogany 694 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Dupre, supra ; concurring opinion
State v. Corry 610 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Desdunes 576 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Dupre, *524 supra ; concurring opinion
State v. Jones 565 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Coleman 548 So. 2d 1214 La. 1989
State v. Chavis 542 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Dupre 500 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Sensley 460 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Calzadilla 455 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court held: "...
State v. Crawford 454 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Talbot 408 So. 2d 861 La. 1981
State v. Bell 381 So. 2d 393 La. 1980
State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
State v. Madison 345 So. 2d 485 La. 1977
we agreed that identification in court at trial or at a preliminary hearing, where the accused sits at the defense table and may be the only black in the courtroom, may be highly suggestive.
State v. Johnson 343 So. 2d 155 La. 1977
State v. Jackson 338 So. 2d 1363 La. 1976
(Docket No. 57,558), this day rendered, the trial court was in error in concluding that it did not possess any discretion whatsoever to grant a defendant’s request for a lineup.