Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tyler, 342 So. 2d 574.
-
In re State in Interest of J.S.
268 So. 3d 311
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/4/94), (statute defining first degree murder as killing of human being when defendant has specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm upon more than one person does not require proof that defendant actually killed or inflicted great bodily harm upon second victim, only that he had specific intent to do so); , 582 (La.
-
State v. Sandifer
249 So. 3d 142
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
at a group of people specifically intends to kill the victims"); State v. Tyler , , 582 (La.
- State v. Do 208 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
There could be no attempted murder of more than one person.” However, cert.
-
State v. Thomas
159 So. 3d 1115
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
There could be no attempted murder of more than one person.” However, cert.
- State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Quang T. Do 130 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State v. Holmes 119 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State v. Godfrey 4 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Ross 965 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- State v. Brown 965 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- State v. Craig 944 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Mitchell 894 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- State v. Severin 885 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
-
State v. Greco
862 So. 2d 1152
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
” State v. Tyler, supra[, ].
-
State v. Gaddis
839 So. 2d 1258
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
cert denied, 431 U.S. 917 , 97 S.Ct.
- State v. Cherry 752 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Jefferson 735 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
- State v. Perron 686 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
-
State v. Guillory
670 So. 2d 301
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
in which the defendant was convicted of first degree murder by firing a gun into a crowd, the court stated: ...
- State v. Guy 669 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- Distinguished State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. May 639 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
State v. Hall
606 So. 2d 972
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Further, in which the defendant was convicted of first degree murder by firing a gun into a crowd and thereby killing someone, the court stated that "there is authority in law for the proposition that shooting into a crowd indiscriminately with intent to kill someone is an assault with intent to kill each of them."
- State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- State v. Battieste 597 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Wille
595 So. 2d 1149
La. 1992
seems to hold that recusation under LSA-C.Cr.P.
- State v. Clark 581 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
-
State v. Holland
544 So. 2d 461
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Prudholm, supra
- State v. Ward 542 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Gray 526 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Smith
520 So. 2d 1252
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); cert.
-
State v. Medford
489 So. 2d 957
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
See State v. Tobias, supra ; cert.
-
State v. Reynolds
473 So. 2d 886
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 ; cert.
- State v. Andrews 452 So. 2d 687 La. 1984
- State v. Davis 431 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Clayton 427 So. 2d 827 La. 1983
- State v. Simmons 414 So. 2d 705 La. 1982
-
State v. Chapman
410 So. 2d 689
La. 1982
s/ Ruth vonUnwerth Ruth vonUnwerth SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1980 s/ Garic Kenneth Barranger GARIC KENNETH BARRANGER" [4] cert.
-
State v. Spell
399 So. 2d 551
La. 1981
that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying a motion for a new trial based upon the recantation of trial testimony by a key witness.
- State v. McDonald 387 So. 2d 1116 La. 1980
- State v. Main Motors, Inc. 383 So. 2d 327 La. 1980
- State in Interest of Giangrosso 385 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- State v. Martin 376 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
- State v. Hills 354 So. 2d 186 La. 1978