DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Francis, 337 So. 2d 487.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Carper 107 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Roberts 966 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Watson 900 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, *335 (La.1983)
  • State v. Guerra 834 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    2nd Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Troulliet 643 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Bennett 591 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Williams 497 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    1982); State v. Humphrey, supra; State v. Flores, 169 La.
  • State v. Nash 494 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Feazell 486 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ denied
  • Prosper v. Smith 482 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Bertrand 461 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    —eight year old third grade boy had sufficient understanding to testify; — eight year old girl had sufficient understanding to testify; —seven year old boy at the time of the crime occurrence and nine years old at the time of trial had sufficient understanding to testify.
  • State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    the Supreme Court noted that a trial judge, when the need appears, *648 will ordinarily permit leading questions to children, or to witnesses so ignorant, timid, weak-minded, or deficient in the English language, that they cannot otherwise be brought to understand what information is sought.
  • State v. Garay 453 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Armstrong 453 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 443 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Foy 439 So. 2d 433 La. 1983
  • State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
    [eight year old third grade boy had sufficient understanding to testify]; [eight year old girl had sufficient understanding to testify]; [seven year old boy at time of crime occurrence and nine years old at time of trial had sufficient understanding to testify].
  • State v. Jackson 419 So. 2d 425 La. 1982
  • State v. Edwards 419 So. 2d 881 La. 1982
  • State v. Vanderhoff 415 So. 2d 190 La. 1982
  • State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
    this Court noted the following: ...
  • State v. Skipper 387 So. 2d 592 La. 1980
  • State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
  • State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
  • State v. Thompson 364 So. 2d 908 La. 1978
  • State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
    quoting from McCormick, Evidence, sec.
  • State v. Noble 342 So. 2d 170 La. 1977