Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vincent, 338 So. 2d 1376.

40 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Sidney Simoneaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    “Where the document offered in evidence is a mechanical reproduction of the original, and is its substantial equivalent, it is admissible unless it can be shown by the defendant that its content does not accurately reflect the original.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Edwin Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State v. Stewart 46 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Russell, supra.
  • State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    : Neither the coroner's testimony nor the certification of the coroner's report was required to prove the victim's death.
  • State v. Russell 966 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    explains: Neither the coroner's testimony nor the certification of the coroner's report was required to prove the victim's death.
  • State v. Anderson 942 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jason 820 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jackson 714 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Cyriak 684 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Smith 679 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    admission over objection of a copy of an original is |5reversible error only upon a showing that the content of the purported copy does not accurately reflect that of the original.
  • State v. Joe 678 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Campbell 673 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hensley 608 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    2658 , 53 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977)
  • State v. Hayes 585 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • Parmelee v. Martin Marietta Michoud Aerospace, Inc. 566 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Martin 562 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Prophet 552 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    1022 , 71 L.Ed.2d 308 (1982)
  • State v. Griffin 540 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Comeaux 514 So. 2d 84 La. 1987
  • State v. Roux 487 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Verrett 467 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    State v. Wilkerson, supra
  • State v. Daigle 440 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the primary purpose of LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Buras 439 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Verrett 419 So. 2d 455 La. 1982
  • State v. Crawford 410 So. 2d 1076 La. 1982
  • State v. Wilkerson 403 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
  • State v. Foote 379 So. 2d 1058 La. 1980
  • State v. Andrews 369 So. 2d 1049 La. 1979
  • State v. Unger 362 So. 2d 1095 La. 1978
    C. McCormick, Handbook of the Law of Evidence, § 282 (2d Ed. 1972); 2 Wharton's Criminal Evidence, §§ 315, 321 (13th Ed. 1972); State v. Vincent, La., (1976).
  • State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
    Art. 652; State v. Rollins, La., (1977); State v. Daigle, La., (1977); State v. Vincent, La., (1976).
  • State v. Robertson 358 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
  • State v. Hoffpauir 355 So. 2d 929 La. 1978
    See Pugh, Louisiana Evidence Law 462 (1974) (La.
  • State v. Winzer 354 So. 2d 533 La. 1978
    this Court discussed the purpose of Article 105's requiring the coroner to make a written report of his investigation to the district attorney: Article 105 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, "is designed primarily to provide the flow of information neede
  • State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
  • State v. Stuart 344 So. 2d 1006 La. 1977