Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clift, 339 So. 2d 755.

54 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kevin Robert Sterling La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
(observing that “Louisiana law requires only a showing of general intent, not specific intent, in order to establish that a person is guilty of possessing [a controlled dangerous substance]”).16 The intent to distribute element, by express statutory language, refers to a specific criminal intent.
State v. Copelin 206 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Battie 250 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Taylor 123 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969) ]
State of Louisiana v. Louis Vernon Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Mingo 965 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
*956 State v. Young, 05-702 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Edwards 963 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Warren 949 So. 2d 1215 La. 2007
2476, 2485 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538, 550 (1977); Chimel v. California, *1227 supra
State v. Brown 871 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State v. Lee 844 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
the supreme court found, "Louisiana law requires only a showing of general intent, not specific intent, in order to establish that a person is guilty of possessing heroin."
State v. Malvoisin 779 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Guillory 773 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Curtis 739 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Davis 735 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Colomb 720 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Wafer 719 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Garner 694 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Clark 687 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Dabney 633 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Evins 626 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Brewington 601 So. 2d 656 La. 1992
State v. Mitchell 572 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Christopher 561 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Further, the defendant objected to evidence of possession of marijuana at his trial for possession of heroin.
State v. Ritchie 556 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Williams 553 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Magouirk 539 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Haynes 514 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Hebert 507 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Boudreaux 503 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 496 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cormier 487 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Doolittle 482 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Robinson 480 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Ford 450 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
U.S. v. Robinson, 414 *782 U.S. 218 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Sanford 446 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969); (La.
State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Brown 428 So. 2d 438 La. 1983
State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
State v. Elliot 407 So. 2d 659 La. 1981
State v. Williams 398 So. 2d 1112 La. 1981
2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969); (La.
State v. Haarala 398 So. 2d 1093 La. 1981