Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

  • Archie v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV. 543 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Ard v. Samedan Oil Corporation, supra ; Carollo v. Wilson, supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Sexton v. Louisiana Vacuum Services, Inc., supra .
  • Finkelstein v. Pena 538 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Reck v. Stevens, supra; (La.App.
  • Roger v. Cancienne 538 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Levie v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 537 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Carlin v. Blanchard 537 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Creel v. SA Tarver & Son Tractor Co. 537 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    No. 1, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Sayes v. Pilgrim Manor Nursing Home, Inc. 536 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Trahan v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 536 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    QUANTUM In addressing plaintiff's assertions of error as to the district court's award of damages we quote the applicable law as set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., : "We do reemphasize, however, that before a court of appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award....
  • Darby v. Allstate Insurance Co. 535 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Vice v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 535 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    If the appellate court disturbs an award, its authority is limited to lowering it (or raising it) to the highest (or the lowest) point which is reasonable., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Segura v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 535 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., advised that it is "never appropriate for a Court of Appeal ...
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guidry 536 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    construing the ‘much discretion’ given to the judge or jury by LSA-C.C.
  • Gullo v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 535 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    CoCo v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Wallace v. Upjohn Co. 535 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Marcel v. Allstate Ins. Co. 536 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Thompson v. PetroUnited Terminals, Inc. 536 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Bernard v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 534 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. A survey of the most similar types of injuries convinces this court that the lowest possible award due to plaintiff in accordance with the evidence presented in this case and reasonably within the discretion of this court for past suffering is the amount of $15,000.00 and future pain and su
  • Ardoin v. Dixieland Foods, Inc. 534 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Only after such determination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [v. Winston Industries, Inc., ], for purposes of then determining what would be an appropriate award for the present case.” (Citations and footnotes omitted.)
  • Fredericks v. Louisiana Farm Bureau 534 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • LeBlanc v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 533 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Riche v. City of Baton Rouge 541 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Street v. Equitable Petroleum Corp. 532 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Aikens v. State Farm Insurance 532 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Reck, supra; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Darbonne, supra.
  • Johnson v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 531 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    QUANTUM In addressing plaintiff's assertions of error as to the jury's award of damages we quote the applicable law as set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Zimmerman v. Collins 529 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    See, La.Civ.Code art. 1999 (1984); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Redondo v. CONSOL. FREIGHTWAYS CORP. OF DELAWARE 529 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Moreau v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 527 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Moreau v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 527 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc. 527 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    * * * Only after such determination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [ v. Winston Industries, (La.
  • Harris v. Wright Furniture of Gonzales 527 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    As stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., : We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
  • Landry v. State Farm Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Pearce v. Baltazar 529 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Koury v. Lanier Exp., Inc. 528 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    1980); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Adams v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 525 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    As stated by our supreme court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., : We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
  • Amedee v. Cruse 526 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Ind., Inc.
  • Knopfer v. La. Patient's Comp. Fund 527 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Trahan v. Gulf Insurance Co. 525 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Meshell v. Shamsie 528 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    On the issue of general damages we recognize the general rule of appellate review first espoused by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., as follows: "We do re-emphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
  • Campbell v. Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corp. 528 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Fields v. Senior Citizens Center, Inc. 528 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Towns v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
  • Notto v. Brown 525 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
  • Aucoin v. Mc B R Management Co. 525 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Thus, the jury clearly abused its discretion and under the standards set for our review in Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d at 501 , and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., we are bound to correct the award.
  • Calloway v. City of New Orleans 524 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • King v. Louviere 524 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    La.Civ.Code art. 1934(3) (1870) (in effect on December 1, 1983); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • LeBleu v. Dynamic Indus. Constructors, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Moon v. City of Baton Rouge 522 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Tracy v. Jefferson Parish 523 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Emerson v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Lewis v. MacKe Bldg. Services, Inc. 524 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Here, the inquiry is whether the trier of fact abused his much discretion in fixing this award, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., *22 (La.1977)
  • Pattison v. BF Goodrich Co. 522 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Conner v. Motel 6, Inc. 521 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.