Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

Thomas v. Malbreaux 525 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
construing the ‘much discretion’ given to the judge or jury by LSA-C.C.
Zeagler v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. 521 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Hunt v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ. 522 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Hardin v. Munchies Food Store 521 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Reck, supra; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Walls v. Henley 520 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Hagberg v. Manuel 525 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Sikes v. McLean Trucking Co., 383 So.
Lopez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. 524 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Ammons v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 525 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Vanzant v. New Orleans Public Service 517 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Thompson v. Colony Ins. Co. 520 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Edmonds v. Shelter Mutual Ins.
Karam v. DeSoto 520 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Only after such determination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [ v. Winston Industries, Inc., ] for purposes of then determining what would be an appropriate award for the present case."
Legnon v. McDonald 517 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The manifest error rule as applied to review of quantum awards which was set out in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., has not changed: We do reemphasize ...
Bruce v. Williams 516 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
The appellate court increased the general damage award, applying Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., to $15,000.
Davis v. Kyzar 516 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Parker v. Day 516 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Riche v. City of Baton Rouge 515 So. 2d 765 La. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Williams v. American Crescent Elevator 518 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
In Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., , (La.1976), the Supreme Court stated that before a court of appeal can disturb the quantum award made by a trial court, the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making the award.
Schwamb v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 516 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Reck v. Stevens, *467 -501 (La.1979); Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Siemann v. Teston 517 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Clark v. State Farm Ins. Co. 520 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., , at pages 335 and 336 (La.1977).
Cashio v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 518 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Matlosz v. Goza 515 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Stein v. Langer 515 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Matthews v. Felps 515 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Bergeron v. Houma Hosp. Corp. 514 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Irving v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 517 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Cole v. City of West Lake 517 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Perkins v. Ricks 514 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Levet v. Calais & Sons, Inc. 514 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Higginbotham v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury 513 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Partner v. Anderson 513 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Johnson v. Pepperman 512 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Reck v. Stevens, supra; (La.App.
Andrews v. Mosley Well Service 514 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Melder v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 512 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
art. 1934(3); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., La.1976)."
Vallere v. Nicor Exploration Company 512 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc. 510 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
St. Tammany Manor v. Spartan Bldg. Corp. 509 So. 2d 424 La. 1987
335 n. 1 (La.1976) (citing Barham, The Importance of Writ Denials, 21 Loy.L.Rev.
Rodgers v. National Dealer Services, Inc. 508 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., LOSS OF CONSORTIUM Rodgers' wife complains that the award of $7,500 for loss of consortium is too low.
Peacock's, Inc. v. Shreveport Alarm Co. 510 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
2d Cir.1987), citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Edmonds v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 508 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Womack v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 508 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Powell v. A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. 508 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The leading case on the proper standard of review of damage awards is Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., which states: “We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
Miller v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 510 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (La.
Cheramie v. Brunet 510 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Walker v. Creech 509 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Appellee cites Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., for the applicable standard of review of trial court damage awards.
Brown v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 503 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Karl v. Amoco Production Co. 507 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Civ.Code art. 1999 "much discretion" granted the trier of fact in fixing damages, is that an appellate court should not disturb the award unless there has been an abuse of discretion.
Boehm v. Bienemy 508 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Mart v. Hill 505 So. 2d 1120 La. 1987
[28] Quantum At the outset, we note that this case is not fully governed by the principles set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Scott v. Barclay's Amer. Leasing Service 506 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.