Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

Brandy Lynn Fecke, Stephen C. Fecke, and Karen Fecke v. the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University … 217 So. 3d 237 La. 2016
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Aguillard v. Gregory 194 So. 3d 612 La. 2016
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Thibodeaux v. Donnell 189 So. 3d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1 Cir. 3/23/07) , , writs denied, 07-1195, 07-1218 (La.9/21/07), , 341, citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (noting the reviewing court’s proper role on review of an inadequate general damages award due to a jury’s abuse of discretion).
Marcus Miller v. Harold J. Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Tezeno v. Hashim 185 So. 3d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Miller v. Thibeaux 184 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Caldwell v. Anpac Insurance Co. 185 So. 3d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Id.; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Cyril Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
10 Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted).
Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 183 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
■ Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations-omitted).
Kyle Daigle v. Brandon Picou La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Patrick Jeansonne v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Jeansonne v. City of Marksville 180 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Mitchell v. Access Medical Supplies, Inc. 184 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Aymami v. St.
Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Randall A. Biddy v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. 175 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Skillman v. Riverside Baptist Church of Jefferson Parish 171 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In making this determination, the trial court is not constrained as the courts of appeal are to raising (or lowering) the award to the lowest (or highest) point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded that court, as set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Parvin Wesley Brown, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1 Cir.1989), cited with approval by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., explained: The Coco [v. Winston Industries, Inc., ] standard of review does not apply to a trial court’s review of a jury’s award.
Watson v. Hicks 172 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Clement, 666 So.2d at 611 ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Brown v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 166 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 Cir.1989), cited with approval by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., explained: The Coco [v. Winston Industries, Inc., ] standard of *1204 review does not apply to a trial court’s review of a juryes award.
Bourg v. Cajun Cutters, Inc. 174 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Aymami v. St.
Edmond v. Cherokee Insurance Co. 170 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Taylor Adam Burtner v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Burtner v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government 176 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Ronsonette v. St. Bernard Parish Government ex rel. Taffaro 165 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wainwright , 00-0492, p. 6, 774 So.2d at 74 (citing Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ).
Tiras Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Co. 167 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Lohenis v. Rousse 166 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-01 (La.1979), and Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., -36 (La.1976).
Patricia Parker v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Parker v. Town of Woodworth 160 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Williams v. Walgreen Louisiana Co. 168 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Charles, Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans Casino 158 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 u Clement, 666 So.2d at 611 ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Hobgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 156 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Ober v. Champagne 166 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Patricia Ann Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. 158 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Gaspard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 155 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., Aymami v. St.
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 152 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Youn, 623 So.2d at 1260 (citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ).
Tangela Annette Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Anthony v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC. 146 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Aymami v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 145 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., Broussard v. Razden, 98-2576 (La.App.
Sandra Hunter, Individually v. Christus Health Central Louisiana, Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Hunter v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 137 So. 3d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Live Oak Homes Corp. v. Carrier Sales & Distribution, LLC 140 So. 3d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., Carnaggio v. Cambre, 11-552 (La.App.
Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board 144 So. 3d 922 La. 2014
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Mary Phyllis Soileau v. Smith True Value and Rental La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
5 General Damages Our jurisprudence has consistently held that in the assessment of damages, much discretion is left to the judge or jury, and upon appellate review such awards will be disturbed only when there has been a clear abuse of that discretion, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Dawn Bourque, Individually v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Only after an appellate court has determined that the trier of fact abused its discretion can it disturb a damage award, “and then only to the extent of lowering it (or raising it) to the highest (or lowest) point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded that court.” Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Travis v. Spitale's Bar, Inc. 122 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Hirstius v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. 123 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Lucie C. Ford v. Bituminous Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.