Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

Felicia Clement v. Scott A. Citron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Ford v. Bituminous Insurance Co. 115 So. 3d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Clement v. Citron 115 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Betty Issac v. Remington College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Isaac v. Remington College 114 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ...
Shenan Smith Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board 157 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Serou v. Touro Infirmary 105 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Coco v. Winston Industries, Incorporated
Jo Anna Savant v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
If the award is not manifestly erroneous, it is reviewed under the constraints of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., i.e., the abuse of discretion standard of review.
Savant v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 104 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
If the award is not manifestly erroneous, it is reviewed under the constraints of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., i.e., the abuse of discretion standard of review.
Nina Skinner v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Wainwright, 00–0492, p. 6, 774 So.2d at 74 (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted)).
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., -36 (La.1976).
Tommie M. Granger, M.D. v. Christus Health Central Louisiana D/B/A Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
10/17/00)], 774 So.2d [70,] 74 (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ).
Granger v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 97 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wainwright [v. Fontenot], 00-0492, p. 6 [ (La.10/17/00) ], 774 So.2d [70,] 74 (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ).
Gaunt v. Progressive Security Insurance 92 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted).
Queen Alexander, Et Ux. v. Zachary Laborde La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
(citing Coco v. Winston Ind., Inc., ).
Alexander v. Laborde 97 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(citing Coco v. Winston hid., Inc., ).
Buckheister v. United States Environmental Services, L.L.C. 97 So. 3d 414 La. 2012
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Margaret Montalvo Richard v. Harold Artigue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Richard v. Artigue 87 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Caskey v. Merrick Construction Co. 86 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
If the appellate court determines that the trial court properly granted the JNOV, i.e., that reasonable men must find that the jury award was an abuse of discretion, the trial court’s damage assessments are reviewed under the standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Twiner v. Dinvaut 90 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
ed, our supreme court has held, ‘To modify the amount of an award for general damages, an appellate court must find that the trial judge or jury has *1114 abused the ‘much discretion’ accorded by the codal provision; (2) The awards in other cases serve only as an aid in determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion and rivet no steel frame of uniformity.’ Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., quoting from Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Sonja Dauzat Deligans, Et Ux. v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Wainwright, 00-0492, p. 6, 774 So.2d at 74 (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted)).
Deligans v. Ace American Insurance 86 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wainwright , 00-0492, p. 6, 774 So.2d at 74 (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted)).
Adrienne Stelly v. Zurich American Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (La.
Stelly v. Zurich American Ins. Co. 83 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Constance Cormier v. Republic Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
(citing Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ).
Cormier v. Republic Insurance Co. 118 So. 3d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(citing Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ).
Powell v. Chabanais Concrete Pumping, Inc. 82 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Eunice M. Guidry v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Wainwright, 00-0492, p. 6, 774 So.2d at 74 (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted)).
Guidry v. Allstate Insurance Co. 83 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Wainwright , 00-0492, p. 6, 774 So.2d at 74 (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted)).
Carnaggio v. Cambre 84 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Steven P. Guillory, Et Ux. v. Christopher P. Saucier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
George McCarthy v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Guillory v. Saucier 79 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
McCarthy v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 82 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Harold Thibodeaux v. Melinda Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston 14 Indus., Inc., ‖ Baltazar v. Wolinski, 10-757, p. 14 (La.App.
Carl R. Guidry, Et Ux. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Daigle v. City of Shreveport 78 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Id.; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Thibodeaux v. Trahan 74 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ” Baltazar v. Wolinski, 10-757, p. 14 (La.App.
Guidry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 74 So. 3d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Reeves v. Grove 72 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Deroche v. Latour 71 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Arlene Chambers v. Village of Moreauville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir.1986); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 60 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
*135 App. 3 Cir.1986); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Matlock v. City of Shreveport 58 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Terrance D. Andrus v. Accc Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC 58 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Mille S. McFadden v. Import One, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
McFadden v. Import One, Inc. 56 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by