Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bennett, 341 So. 2d 847.

48 citing documents.

State ex rel. M.J. 160 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
18 (“[T]he judge to whom the motion relates must answer the threshold question of whether the motion states valid grounds.”).
State v. Guilleard 26 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. John Stanley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
See also, Moore, and State v. Bishop, 98-1147, p. 8 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo Tennors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Tennors 923 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Wilbert Rideau v. James R. Andrus, Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-59 (La.1976), the supreme court discussed the procedure where a motion to recuse has been filed as follows: C.Cr.P.
Rideau v. Andrus 868 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-59 (La.1976), the supreme court discussed the procedure where a motion to recuse has been filed as follows: C.Cr.P.
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
State v. Magee 643 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
ency and took stand at trial to lay foundation for admission of confession); (motion to recuse district attorney properly denied and actions described as "consistent with his function as the prosecutorial force" where district attorney interviewed defendant immediately after arrest and held a press conference regarding the arrest); (same as above).
State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. King 520 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Kibodeaux 524 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Digilormo 505 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 490 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Bradley 490 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Great American Insurance Co. v. St. James Parish Sheriff's Office 461 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Cody 446 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Clark 442 So. 2d 1129 La. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
State v. Gaskin 412 So. 2d 1007 La. 1982
State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
State v. Stewart, supra .
State v. Adams 394 So. 2d 1204 La. 1981
State v. Sheppard, supra
State v. Clark 387 So. 2d 1124 La. 1980
State v. Delore 381 So. 2d 455 La. 1980
State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
State v. Sheppard, supra ; State v. de la Beckwith, supra ; State v. Stewart, supra .
State v. Brown 371 So. 2d 751 La. 1979
State v. Benson 368 So. 2d 716 La. 1979
State v. Swift 363 So. 2d 499 La. 1978
State v. Kelly 362 So. 2d 1071 La. 1978
State v. Atkins 360 So. 2d 1341 La. 1978
[4] For cases holding that the "due diligence" requirement is ordinarily not satisfied when defense counsel fails to have the potential witness subpoenaed, see, (La.
State v. Dilworth 358 So. 2d 1254 La. 1978
Where this same objection was raised in State v. Bennett, La., (1976), we stated: "Even assuming that the best evidence rule should and does apply to real evidence, this assignment does not present reversible error.
State v. Terry 359 So. 2d 172 La. 1978
State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
State v. Bolton 354 So. 2d 517 La. 1978
State v. Matthews 354 So. 2d 552 La. 1978
State v. Bias 354 So. 2d 1330 La. 1978
State v. Whitmore 353 So. 2d 1286 La. 1977
2392, 2401 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Bennett, La., (1976).
State v. Trudell 350 So. 2d 658 La. 1977
State v. Rhodes 351 So. 2d 103 La. 1977
824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965)
State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
State v. Adams 347 So. 2d 195 La. 1977
State v. Bell 346 So. 2d 1090 La. 1977