DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Lyons, 342 So. 2d 196.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir. 1976), and in State in the Interest of W.B., (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    App. 2d Cir.1976), and in State in the Interest of W.B., (La.App.
  • State v. Ceaser 859 So. 2d 639 La. 2003
    [3] Lewis, 386 So.2d at 1086; State v. Lopez, 256 La.
  • State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
  • State v. Sims 823 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Barr 806 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Dupre 775 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the ordinance used to arrest the defendant in that case; however, it upheld the defendant's conviction for battery, finding that she was not legally entitled to resist arrest.
  • State v. Miller 703 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Woolverton, [ ]; M (La App.2d Cir.1976).
  • City of Monroe v. Goldston 661 So. 2d 428 La. 1995
  • State v. Stowe 635 So. 2d 168 La. 1994
  • Fisher v. Dept. of Public Safety 555 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. McCoy 546 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    State v. Woolverton, supra; (La.App.
  • City of West Monroe v. Cox 511 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    App. 2d Cir.1976), and in State in the Interest of W.B., (La.App.
  • Ross v. Sheriff of Lafourche Parish 479 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Woolverton 474 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Meyers 462 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    held unpunishable the response "Fuck you" by a woman accosted by a police officer on a complaint that she was soliciting for prostitution.
  • State in Interest of WB 461 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lamb 458 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Miller 440 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    and City of Monroe v. Ducas, 203 La.
  • State v. Fontenot 410 So. 2d 1112 La. 1982
    However, we found that the epithets "S___" and "F___ you" were not words which, when addressed to a policeman would normally incite the officer to an immediate breach of the peace.
  • State v. Lindsay 388 So. 2d 781 La. 1980
    City of Monroe v. Ducas, 203 La.
  • State in Interest of Lewis 386 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Norrell v. City of Monroe 375 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    White v. Morris, supra .
  • City of Shreveport v. Shaffer 369 So. 2d 1353 La. 1979
    Unlike the case on which relator relies, , the Shreveport ordinance under which relator was prosecuted is a “fighting words” breach of the peace statute.
  • State v. Perry 364 So. 2d 900 La. 1978
  • Small v. Levy 355 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • White v. Morris 345 So. 2d 461 La. 1977
    we held that abusive words, including "s___" and "f___ you" uttered to a policeman upon his attempt to question the defendant were protected speech.