DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ward v. Ward, 339 So. 2d 839.

61 citing documents.

  • Tyfanny Vermaelen v. Harry Vermaelen, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • Vermaelen v. Vermaelen 240 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Guillot v. Munn 756 So. 2d 290 La. 2000
  • Launey v. Launey 722 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Wagner v. Wagner 686 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • McAlpine v. McAlpine 679 So. 2d 85 La. 1996
    138, 140 (1940) (citing Player, supra ); (legislatively overruled on other grounds by Act 72 of 1979, amending LSA-C.C.
  • Hester v. Hester 643 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Tolar v. Tolar 639 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Kelly v. Kelly 596 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Clary v. Clary 550 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • Prudhomme v. Prudhomme 526 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Art. 160, the court may allow a claimant spouse permanent alimony only “when a spouse has not been at fault and has not sufficient means for support.”
  • Hornung v. Hornung 498 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Guillory v. Guillory 490 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Aucoin v. Aucoin 488 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Guidry v. Guidry 467 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Buxton v. Buxton 458 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Arceneaux v. Arceneaux 426 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Whipple v. Whipple 424 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Cormier v. Cormier 422 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    which was decided prior to the 1979 amendment to LSA-C.C.
  • Terjersen v. Terjersen 420 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    That difficulty may well justify obliging such a person's capable spouse to pay alimony
  • Hamiter v. Hamiter 419 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Oddo v. Oddo 416 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Peraino v. Peraino 414 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    ort her in the manner to which she is accustomed where it concerns food, clothing, shelter, etc. Appellant contends that this conclusion is compelled by the fact that our jurisprudence reveals considerable variance from case to case in the amounts of alimony found to be sufficient to satisfy the wife's needs: awarded $650.00 per month
  • Smith v. Smith 416 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    earning capability” of the spouse claiming alimony “in the light of all other circumstances.”
  • Harrington v. Campbell 413 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Duncan v. Duncan 408 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Volker v. Volker 398 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Super v. Super 397 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Lebouef v. Liner 396 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • King v. King 390 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • White v. White 393 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Arrendell v. Arrendell 390 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    [1] The amendment thus constitutes a that the claimant wife's earning capacity could not be considered in determining her entitlement to or the amount of alimony after divorce.
  • Higdon v. Higdon 385 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    *399 NECESSITY OF ALIMONY The following standard is set forth in many cases, for the awarding of permanent alimony: "This alimony after divorce is not awarded in an amount sufficient to support the former wife in the manner in which she is accustomed to live; rather, it is awarded in an amount sufficient to provide for her maintenance, which includes food, clothing, shelter, and oth
  • Nix v. Nix 385 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Plaintiff applied for and was granted a (La.App.
  • Adams v. Adams 384 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    La.1976, there is a difference in the nature of alimony pendente lite set under the provisions of Article 148 of the Louisiana Civil Code as compared to alimony after divorce which is regulated under Article 160.
  • Galbraith v. Galbraith 382 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    [1] Neither the brevity of the marriage ( ) nor the wife's capacity to earn a gainful wage ( ) are factors to be considered in setting alimony pendente lite.
  • Gamble v. Gamble 391 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Nelson v. Nelson 377 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Ward v. Ward, La.1976, ; Bilello v. Bilello, 240 La.
  • Clausen v. Clausen 375 So. 2d 1315 La. 1979
    In making that determination, (La.
  • Bruner v. Bruner 373 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    which held that a wife is not required to work in order to be entitled to permanent alimony.
  • Mouton v. Mouton 372 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    [3] Ward v. Ward, La., ; Bilello v. Bilello, 240 La.
  • Landeche v. Airhart 372 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Liles v. Liles 369 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    [2] Ward v. Ward, La., .
  • Clausen v. Clausen 368 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    which held “If the wife is unemployed, however, and receives no earnings, her earning capacity or potential income is not a proper basis for rejecting alimony.
  • Laird v. Laird 363 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    [3] Ward v. Ward, La., ; Smith v. smith, 217 La.
  • Stolier v. Stolier 357 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    [2] Ward v. Ward, La., ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
  • Boisfontaine v. Boisfontaine 357 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    The wife had no income, and there was no evidence of her ability to earn income [a ].
  • Loyacano v. Loyacano 358 So. 2d 304 La. 1978
    Ward v. Ward, La., (1976).
  • Meyer v. Meyer 357 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • White v. White 356 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977