Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ogea v. Jacobs, 344 So. 2d 953.

28 citing documents.

Silton Ardoin v. Gde Renovations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 6/11/14), (), writ denied, 14-1459 (La.
Debra Cloud v. Earl M. Gibson, Jr.. and Chase Mortgage Company-West La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Dillon Gray v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Naik v. United Rentals, Inc. 182 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual, supra; Johnson v. Mike Anderson’s Seafood Inc., 2013-9379 (La.App.
Johnson v. Mike Anderson's Seafood, Inc. 144 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Cacamo v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 798 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Whittenburg v. Zurich American Ins. Co. 786 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Moreover, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows in Landis : (La.
Landis v. Moreau 779 So. 2d 691 La. 2001
this court held that the written opinion of an employee who was neither an attorney nor an expert was not protected from discovery under the "mental impression" provision of La.Code Civ.
Simmons v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 780 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Sonier v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., -36 (La.App.
Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co. 758 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
26(b)(3), which requires “a showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials in the preparation of the party’s case and that the party is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means.” (interpreting the terms “unfair prejudice” and “undue hardship” as used in La.
Byrd v. River Parish Maintenance, Inc. 695 So. 2d 976 La. 1997
Stegall v. Auxt 693 So. 2d 788 La. 1997
Sass v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. 689 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
arguing that the lapse of time combined with a witness’s unavailability, reluctance, hostility, lapse of memory or apparent deviation from his prior statement may warrant an order for the production and inspection of such a statement and/or accident report.
Rader v. Regional Transit Authority 595 So. 2d 644 La. 1992
Savin v. Allstate Ins. Co. 579 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
In urging this assignment of error
Ward v. Tenneco Oil Co. 564 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
TL James & Co. v. Kenner Landing, Inc. 562 So. 2d 914 La. 1990
Madison v. Travelers Ins.
Breaux v. Sam 534 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Martinolich v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 532 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Martinolich v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 532 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Turner v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 527 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. v. Stumpf 458 So. 2d 448 La. 1984
Hodges v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 125 La. 1983
and authorities cited therein.
Smith v. Travelers Ins. Co. 418 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
She relies on the case of Ogea v. Jacobs, La., , for the proposition that statements taken shortly after the accident are of unique value for discovery purposes.
Guy v. Tonglet 379 So. 2d 744 La. 1980
"[T]he test of discoverability is not the admissibility of the particular information sought, but whether the information appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence".
Cargill, Inc. v. Cementation Co. of America 377 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Viator v. Sonnier 355 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Harris v. Ryan 355 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
American Mark Distributing Corp. v. Louisvilie & Nashville Railroad Co., (La.App.