Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haskins v. Clary, 346 So. 2d 193.

147 citing documents.

Williams v. Touro Infirmary 578 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Kuebler v. Martin 578 So. 2d 113 La. 1991
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Petrocana, Inc. v. MARGO INC. 577 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
SK Whitty & Co. v. LL LAMBERT 576 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Mielke v. Health America La.
Professional Occupational Therapy Services, Inc. v. Vanco Human Services, Inc. 572 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Tenhaaf v. Quenqui 571 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Reppond v. City of Denham Springs 572 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Pines v. Dr. Carlos D. Moreno, Inc. 569 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
COMMERCIAL NAT. BANK IN SHREVEPORT v. Audubon Meadow Partnership 566 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Ward v. Pennington, supra
Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp. 556 So. 2d 559 La. 1990
Flournoy v. Flournoy 546 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Klumpp v. XYZ Ins. Co. 547 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
Menge v. Menge 545 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Thomas v. State 545 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
article 927; Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
W.B. McCartney Oil Co. v. Hataway 544 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Burdis v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury 542 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Moore v. Taylor 541 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Dickerson v. Kemp 540 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Ledet v. Hogue 540 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Roberson v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 535 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2d 618 (La.1984); (La.App.
Leehans v. State Farm Ins. Co. 534 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
While the exception of no cause of action tests the sufficiency of the pleadings, the motion for summary judgment determines whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.
Thomas v. Evergreen Presbyterian Ministries, Inc. 535 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. 530 So. 2d 1151 La. 1988
art. 931 (West 1984); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Opelousas Scrap Materials, Inc. v. STATE, FOSTER HOMES PROGRAM 525 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Gorman v. Swaggart 524 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Succession of Fakier 541 So. 2d 1372 La. 1988
art. 865 (West 1984); (La.
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 522 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Mielke v. Health America Louisiana Partners, L.P. 522 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
For the purpose of determining the validity of the exception, all well-pleaded allegations are accepted as true, and if the allegations set forth a cause of action as to any part of the demand, the exception must be overruled.” (citations omitted)
McIntyre v. McIntyre 519 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Ward v. Pennington, supra
Hinds v. Poo-Yie's, Inc. 520 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
art. 865, supra, comment (b); Erath Sugar Company v. Broussard, 240 La.
Saxena v. Saxena 518 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
In my opinion, this conclusion is directly contrary to a long established procedural rule approved many times over the years by the Louisiana Supreme Court and the Louisiana Courts of Appeal (see citations quoted below) : *1101 The general rule applicable to trial of such exceptions is that an exception of no cause of action must be overruled unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based; that is, unless plaintif
Esteve v. Iberia Parish Hosp. 520 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Lucky v. Fricks 511 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Touchton v. Kroger Company 512 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Patterson v. Livingston Bank 509 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Dier v. Hamilton 501 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Kendrick v. City of Lake Charles 500 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-195 (La.1977) (citations omitted).
Goldstein v. Serio 496 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Clingan v. Doughty 491 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hero Land Co. v. Texaco, Inc., at 96 (La.1975); Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
Gonzales v. Parish of St. Bernard 490 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Smith v. Howard 489 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Richards v. New England Insurance Co. 488 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Latter & Blum, Inc. v. AJ Warehouse, Inc. 487 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Guzzetta v. Texas Pipe Line Co. 485 So. 2d 508 La. 1986
1984); Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Bourgeois v. Medical Center of East New Orleans 482 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
White v. White 479 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Rosenbloom v. Mecom 478 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Farria v. BONNE TERREBONNE OF HOUMA, INC. 476 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Yousufali v. Southland Corp. 467 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Trigg v. Camper Village, Inc. 467 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985